Stopforth v Minister of Justice and Others, Veenendaal v Minister of Justice and Others (316/97, 317/97) [1999] ZASCA 72; [1999] 4 All SA 383 (A); 2000 (1) SA 113 (SCA) (27 September 1999)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Amnesty Committee does not have jurisdiction to grant amnesty for offences committed by South African citizens in Namibia, as such acts were not associated with the South African conflicts of the past and were not directed against the South African State, former States, or political organisations as contemplated by the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act. The acts in question were committed in support of a conflict in Namibia and targeted the United Nations, not South African political opponents. Furthermore, the offences were not triable in South African courts, as they were not extra-territorial crimes such as treason. Parliament...
- Citation
- [1999] ZASCA 72
- Parties
- Appellant: Darryl Garth Stopforth; Appellant: Lennerd Michael Veenendaal; Respondent: Minister of Justice; Respondent: Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Amnesty Committee); Respondent: Government of Namibia; Respondent: Minister of Safety and Security
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 1999
- Case Number
- 316/97, 317/97
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Application to Suspend Extradition and Refer Extradition Application Back
- Outcome
- The Stopforth appeal is dismissed with costs. The Veenendaal appeal is struck off the roll with costs.
- Judges
- Mahomed, Olivier, Melunsky, Farlam, Madlanga
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Amnesty Jurisdiction, Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, Territorial Jurisdiction, Fugitive From Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darryl Garth Stopforth
Appellant
Lennerd Michael Veenendaal
Appellant
Minister of Justice
Respondent
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Amnesty Committee)
Respondent
Government of Namibia
Respondent
Minister of Safety and Security
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Application to Suspend Extradition and Refer Extradition Application Back
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Amnesty Committee have jurisdiction to grant amnesty for offences committed by South African citizens outside the Republic?
- 2 Can the extradition order be suspended pending adjudication of amnesty applications?
- 3 Is there a legal basis to refer the extradition application back to the magistrate after an order has been made?
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Amnesty Committee does not have jurisdiction to grant amnesty for offences committed by South African citizens in Namibia, as such acts were not associated with the South African conflicts of the past and were not directed against the South African State, former States, or political organisations as contemplated by the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act. The acts in question were committed in support of a conflict in Namibia and targeted the United Nations, not South African political opponents. Furthermore, the offences were not triable in South African courts, as they were not extra-territorial crimes such as treason. Parliament...
Court Disposition
The Stopforth appeal is dismissed with costs. The Veenendaal appeal is struck off the roll with costs.
Orders
- The Stopforth appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
- The Veenendaal appeal is struck off the roll with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment