Courtney v Boshoff N.O. and Others (2019/41681)
Courtney v Boshoff N.O. and Others (2019/41681) [2022] ZAGPJHC 1006; [2023] 2 All SA 100 (GJ) (20 December 2022)
The court found that the applicant was not a fugitive from justice and retained locus standi. The final sequestration order was granted in error, as the Insolvency Act requires a provisional order and a return date before a final order may be made. However, the order was not a nullity but a mistake, and remained effective until varied or set aside. The court exercised its discretion under section 149(2) of the Insolvency Act to vary the final order to a provisional sequestration order, with effect from the original date, thereby preserving the status quo and the actions taken by the trustees.…
Source excerpt
- Insolvency Act
- Sequestration Orders
- Variation Of Court Orders
- Locus Standi
- Fugitive From Justice