Super Group Gateway Services v Chakale and Others (JR 219/21) [2022] ZALCJHB 371 (1 September 2022)
The court found that the arbitrator committed a gross irregularity by failing to reasonably and rationally assess the evidence and apply the correct legal principles. The first respondent was subject to clear, written instructions requiring written approval from senior management for any upliftment, which she knowingly disregarded. Her conduct constituted insubordination and a serious breach of trust, justifying dismissal. The arbitrator's reliance on Rawat's instruction and Jansen's lack of intervention was misplaced and irrelevant to the core issue. The absence of remorse and persistent denial of wrongdoing by the first respondent further rendered the employment relationship...
- Citation
- [2022] ZALCJHB 371
- Parties
- Applicant: Super Group Gateway Services (A Division of Super Group Africa (Pty) Ltd); Respondent: Mmaleweng Elleanor Chakale; Respondent: Isaac Sakkie Kekana N.O.; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 September 2022
- Case Number
- JR 219/21
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The review application is granted. The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of the first respondent is found to be substantively fair.
- Judges
- S Snyman
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Insubordination, Review of Arbitration Award, Section 145 Lra, Remorse and Trust Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Super Group Gateway Services (A Division of Super Group Africa (Pty) Ltd)
Applicant
Mmaleweng Elleanor Chakale
Respondent
Isaac Sakkie Kekana N.O.
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of CCMA Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator's award finding the dismissal substantively unfair was reviewable under section 145 of the LRA.
- 2 Whether the employee's conduct constituted insubordination and justified dismissal.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator failed to reasonably assess the evidence and apply the correct legal principles.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the arbitrator committed a gross irregularity by failing to reasonably and rationally assess the evidence and apply the correct legal principles. The first respondent was subject to clear, written instructions requiring written approval from senior management for any upliftment, which she knowingly disregarded. Her conduct constituted insubordination and a serious breach of trust, justifying dismissal. The arbitrator's reliance on Rawat's instruction and Jansen's lack of intervention was misplaced and irrelevant to the core issue. The absence of remorse and persistent denial of wrongdoing by the first respondent further rendered the employment relationship...
Court Disposition
The review application is granted. The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of the first respondent is found to be substantively fair.
Orders
- The applicant's review application is granted.
- The arbitration award issued by the second respondent is reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment