Super Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Regional Wholesale Services (Pty) Ltd (LM035Jul21) [2021] ZACT 62 (6 October 2021)
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the relevant markets identified, as the combined market shares of the parties remain below 15% and their business models differ significantly. The Commission's investigation revealed no significant horizontal or vertical overlaps, and no concerns were raised by customers or competitors. The Tribunal also accepted the parties' submissions that no retrenchments would result from the merger and that the transaction would support enterprise development and expansion of businesses owned by Historically Disadvantaged Persons. No public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the...
- Citation
- [2021] ZACT 62
- Parties
- Applicant: Super Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Regional Wholesale Service (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 2021
- Case Number
- LM035Jul21
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Approval / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- AW Wessels, I Valodia, A Ndoni
- Legal Topics
- Horizontal Merger, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest, B Bbbee Spending, Vertical Overlap, Enterprise Development
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Super Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Regional Wholesale Service (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Approval / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger between Super Group Holdings and Regional Wholesale Service is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns under the Competition Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the relevant markets identified, as the combined market shares of the parties remain below 15% and their business models differ significantly. The Commission's investigation revealed no significant horizontal or vertical overlaps, and no concerns were raised by customers or competitors. The Tribunal also accepted the parties' submissions that no retrenchments would result from the merger and that the transaction would support enterprise development and expansion of businesses owned by Historically Disadvantaged Persons. No public interest concerns were identified. Accordingly, the...
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved without conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment