Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 38

Life Healthcare Group (Pty) Ltd v Fresenius Medical Care South Africa (Pty) Ltd in Respect of the Dialysis Services Business (LM035Jun23)

Life Healthcare Group (Pty) Ltd v Fresenius Medical Care South Africa (Pty) Ltd in Respect of the Dialysis Services Business (LM035Jun23) [2024] ZACT 38 (18 March 2024)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Life Healthcare’s acquisition of Fresenius’s dialysis services business, subject to competition and public interest conditions.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 56

Pioneer Foods (Pty) Ltd v Future Life Health Products (Pty) Ltd (LM200Mar23)

Pioneer Foods (Pty) Ltd v Future Life Health Products (Pty) Ltd (LM200Mar23) [2023] ZACT 56 (3 July 2023)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Pioneer Foods’ acquisition of Future Life’s remaining shares, finding no substantial competition harm and no adverse employment effects.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment
  • Employment Effects
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 20

Clicks Retailers v H Mallach and Associates (LM183Feb23)

Clicks Retailers v H Mallach and Associates (LM183Feb23) [2023] ZACT 20 (12 April 2023)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Clicks Retailers’ acquisition of M-Kem Pharmacy, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Employment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2023] ZACT 1

FLM Proprietary Limited v Everfresh Market Ballito (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM126Oct22)

FLM Proprietary Limited v Everfresh Market Ballito (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM126Oct22) [2023] ZACT 1 (5 January 2023)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved FLM SA’s acquisition of three Food Lover’s Market franchise stores, subject to HDP ownership and supplier-development conditions.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Public Interest Conditions
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Hdp Ownership
  • Supplier Development
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 90

Pick n Pay Retailers (Pty) Ltd v Pick n Pay Douglasdale Family Supermarket & Liquor Store (LM114Sep22)

Pick n Pay Retailers (Pty) Ltd v Pick n Pay Douglasdale Family Supermarket & Liquor Store (LM114Sep22) [2022] ZACT 90; [2024] 1 CPLR 9 (CT) (15 December 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Pick n Pay Retailers’ acquisition of Pick n Pay Douglasdale, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Public Interest
  • Hdp Ownership
  • Employment Effects
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 102

SPE Mid-Market Fund v K2022654763 (South Africa) Pty Ltd (LM118Sep22)

SPE Mid-Market Fund v K2022654763 (South Africa) Pty Ltd (LM118Sep22) [2022] ZACT 102 (15 November 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved SPE Mid-Market Fund I Partnership’s acquisition of sole control over K2022654763 (South Africa) Pty Ltd.

  • Large Merger
  • Public Interest Assessment
  • Hdp Ownership
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Employment Effects
  • Large-merger
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 103

ZA Online Store Proprietary Limited v Shock Proof Investment 202 Proprietary Limited (LM066JUL22)

ZA Online Store Proprietary Limited v Shock Proof Investment 202 Proprietary Limited (LM066JUL22) [2022] ZACT 103 (29 September 2022)

Competition Tribunal approved ZA Online’s acquisition of an additional 0.2% in Shock Proof unconditionally, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Assessment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 31

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Bollore Africa Logistics SAS (LM012APR22)

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Bollore Africa Logistics SAS (LM012APR22) [2022] ZACT 31 (25 July 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved MSC Group’s acquisition of Bolloré Africa Logistics SAS, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 65

Main Street 1878 Proprietary Limited v Grindrod Intermodal business and Others (LM125Nov21)

Main Street 1878 Proprietary Limited v Grindrod Intermodal business and Others (LM125Nov21) [2022] ZACT 65; [2022] 1 CPLR 10 (CT) (31 May 2022)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Main Street 1878’s acquisition of Maersk Inland, Grindrod Intermodal and Ocean Africa Container Lines, subject to information-exchange safeguards.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Information Exchange
  • Public Interest
  • Employment Effects
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2022] ZACT 9

A.P Moller-Maersk A/S v Senator International (LM135Dec21)

A.P Moller-Maersk A/S v Senator International (LM135Dec21) [2022] ZACT 9 (15 March 2022)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved A.P. Moller – Maersk A/S’s acquisition of Senator International, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Overlap
  • Input Foreclosure
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Public Interest Assessment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.