Supermarket Leaseback (Elsburg) (Pty) Ltd. v Santam Insurance (329/89) [1990] ZASCA 131; 1991 (1) SA 410 (AD); (13 November 1990)
Section 156 of the Insolvency Act only applies where the insurer indemnifies the insured for liability incurred towards a third party. In this case, the insurance policy indemnified the tenant for property damage and did not create any obligation to indemnify the tenant for liability towards the landlord. The policy made no reference to the landlord, and the statutory provision was therefore not applicable. The landlord could not claim directly from the insurer under section 156, and the appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [1990] ZASCA 131
- Parties
- Appellant: Supermarket Leaseback (Elsburg) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Santam Insurance
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 1990
- Case Number
- 329/89
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Goldstone, Hoexter, E.M Grosskopf, Milne, Steyn
- Legal Topics
- Insurance Liability, Company Winding Up, Third Party Claims, Insolvency Act Section 156
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Supermarket Leaseback (Elsburg) (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Santam Insurance
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 156 of the Insolvency Act entitle the landlord to claim directly from the insurer after the tenant's liquidation?
- 2 Was the insurance policy issued by the insurer in respect of liability incurred by the tenant towards the landlord?
- 3 Did the landlord comply with the policy's general conditions required for a claim?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 156 of the Insolvency Act only applies where the insurer indemnifies the insured for liability incurred towards a third party. In this case, the insurance policy indemnified the tenant for property damage and did not create any obligation to indemnify the tenant for liability towards the landlord. The policy made no reference to the landlord, and the statutory provision was therefore not applicable. The landlord could not claim directly from the insurer under section 156, and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment