Taxpayer v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (VAT1558) [2018] ZATC 3; 81 SATC 390 (5 December 2018)
The court held that section 8(15) of the VAT Act applies where a single supply consists of both goods and services, and if separate considerations would have attracted different VAT rates, each part is deemed a separate supply. The appellant supplied a single advertising and promotional service to foreign brand owners, which included the distribution of promotional goods locally. The evidence showed that the cost of promotional goods could be separated from the total fee charged. The supply of promotional goods was a cognisable supply capable of notional separation and, by virtue of section 8(15), deemed a separate supply for VAT purposes. The local supply of goods was not exported but...
- Citation
- [2018] ZATC 3
- Parties
- Appellant: Taxpayer; Respondent: Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
- Court
- Tax Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 2018
- Case Number
- VAT 1558
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; additional VAT assessments for the periods 2009, 2010 and 2011 confirmed.
- Judges
- K M Savage
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, Zero Rating, Deeming Provision, Supply of Goods and Services, Apportionment, Interpretation of Vat Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Taxpayer
Appellant
Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 8(15) of the Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991 applies to the appellant's supply of advertising and promotional services to foreign brand owners.
- 2 Whether the supply of promotional goods as part of the advertising and promotional service constitutes a separate supply for VAT purposes.
- 3 Whether the supply of promotional goods should be standard-rated or zero-rated under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 8(15) of the VAT Act applies where a single supply consists of both goods and services, and if separate considerations would have attracted different VAT rates, each part is deemed a separate supply. The appellant supplied a single advertising and promotional service to foreign brand owners, which included the distribution of promotional goods locally. The evidence showed that the cost of promotional goods could be separated from the total fee charged. The supply of promotional goods was a cognisable supply capable of notional separation and, by virtue of section 8(15), deemed a separate supply for VAT purposes. The local supply of goods was not exported but...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; additional VAT assessments for the periods 2009, 2010 and 2011 confirmed.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed and the additional assessments for the VAT periods 2009, 2010 and 2011 raised against the taxpayer by the Commissioner are confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment