Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Malaba v Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (37078/2014) [2024] ZAGPPHC 983 (1 October 2024)
Quantum judgment arising from a train accident claim, with liability settled 70/30 in the plaintiff’s favour and damages assessed after expert evidence on injuries and earning capacity.
Mhlongo v Road Accident Fund (13348/2016) [2024] ZAGPJHC 939 (20 September 2024)
The High Court assessed general damages and loss of earnings for a pedestrian injured by a vehicle, with agreed merits at 75% in the plaintiff’s favour.
Boshomane v Road Accident Fund (Reasons) (77531/2014) [2024] ZAGPPHC 915 (4 September 2024)
High Court reasons in a Road Accident Fund matter: the plaintiff succeeded on 70% merits, Rule 38(2) evidence by affidavit was allowed, and damages were assessed.
Radinene v Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (37128/17) [2024] ZAGPPHC 485 (28 May 2024)
Quantum-only personal injury claim against PRASA. The court awarded 50% of proven general damages, dismissed special damages, and excluded expert costs.
Capitec’s loan cover was supplied free of charge, but that did not prevent it from being a taxable supply. The cover was provided in the course and furtherance of Capitec’s mixed lending business, which comprised both exempt interest-earning and taxable fee-earning components. The supply was therefore not exclusively in the course of exempt activity. Because section 16(3)(c) applies only where the insurance contract is a taxable supply, and the Act’s scheme requires apportionment where such a supply is partly taxable and partly exempt, Capitec was not entitled to a full deduction; the assessm…
Source excerpt
Swart v Road Accident Fund (74231/2014) [2020] ZAGPPHC 542 (3 August 2020)
The High Court awarded the plaintiff damages against the Road Accident Fund, but applied heavy contingencies because of inconsistent evidence and pre-existing conditions.
Taxpayer v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (VAT1558) [2018] ZATC 3; 81 SATC 390 (5 December 2018)
The Tax Court held that section 8(15) of the VAT Act applied to promotional goods supplied as part of a single A&P service, confirming the additional VAT assessments.
Laubscher v Road Accident Fund (98494/15) [2018] ZAGPPHC 592 (30 July 2018)
The court assessed quantum after an agreed 80% liability apportionment, awarding damages for severe injuries, future loss of earning capacity, and general damages.
Nkosi v Road Accident Fund (08/25592) [2018] ZAGPPHC 597 (12 July 2018)
High Court damages judgment against the Road Accident Fund on loss of income and earning capacity, after the court preferred the defendant’s conservative earnings model.
Boltina v Road Accident Fund (941/2014) [2017] ZAECPEHC 27 (25 April 2017)
The High Court awarded damages for severe injuries from a motor collision, accepted the plaintiff’s medical expense and earnings claims, and ordered punitive costs.
Explore more
