TCI-TISO (Rf) (Pty) Limited v Intervent Universal (Pty) Limited (2023/098331) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1189 (20 November 2024)
The defendant failed to disclose a bona fide defence in its affidavit resisting summary judgment. The defences raised, including lack of jurisdiction, duress, and alleged payments, were either unsupported by facts, legally untenable, or not properly pleaded. The defendant's attempt to introduce new defences without amending its plea is impermissible. The certificate of balance supporting the plaintiff's claim was not impeached, and the alleged payment by the defendant occurred before the certificate's date. The High Court has jurisdiction over the matter, and the non-joinder argument regarding the guarantor is without merit. Accordingly, the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 1189
- Parties
- Plaintiff: TCI-TISO (RF) (Pty) Limited; Defendant: Intervent Universal (Pty) Limited
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2024
- Case Number
- 2023/098331
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment Following Affidavit Accepted as Plea
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff.
- Judges
- Theron
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Acknowledgement of Debt, Jurisdiction, Duress, Certificate of Balance, Non Joinder
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TCI-TISO (RF) (Pty) Limited
Plaintiff
Intervent Universal (Pty) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment Following Affidavit Accepted as Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has disclosed a bona fide defence to the plaintiff's claim in its affidavit resisting summary judgment.
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction over the claim amount.
- 3 Whether the acknowledgement of debt was entered into under duress.
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant failed to disclose a bona fide defence in its affidavit resisting summary judgment. The defences raised, including lack of jurisdiction, duress, and alleged payments, were either unsupported by facts, legally untenable, or not properly pleaded. The defendant's attempt to introduce new defences without amending its plea is impermissible. The certificate of balance supporting the plaintiff's claim was not impeached, and the alleged payment by the defendant occurred before the certificate's date. The High Court has jurisdiction over the matter, and the non-joinder argument regarding the guarantor is without merit. Accordingly, the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment for...
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff.
Orders
- Payment of the amount of R672,000.00.
- Interest thereon at the prevailing prime rate plus 2% per month capitalised in arrears from 25 October 2022 to date of payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment