Telkom SA SOC Ltd v Trudon (Pty) Ltd (LM056Jun19) [2019] ZACT 49 (22 July 2019)
- Citation
- [2019] ZACT 49
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, lmraan Valodia
- Case number
- LM056Jun19
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, lmraan Valodia
- Case number
- LM056Jun19
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction involves Telkom acquiring the remaining shares in Trudon, a firm it already controls. There is no horizontal overlap, and the vertical relationship does not alter competitive dynamics, as the Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group pre-merger. The transaction does not raise any foreclosure concerns or result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Furthermore, the parties provided an unequivocal undertaking that no merger-specific retrenchments would occur, and the transaction does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between Telkom SA SOC Ltd and Trudon (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Telkom SA SOC Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Werner RysbergenTrudon (Pty) Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Application / Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the acquisition of the remaining shares in Trudon by Telkom will substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
- 02
Whether the proposed transaction raises any public interest concerns, including employment effects.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Telkom argued that acquiring the remaining shares in Trudon would allow it to fully align Trudon's strategy with its own and leverage Trudon's assets to accelerate its Small and Medium Business investment strategy. The transaction would not result in any merger-specific retrenchments and would not alter market structure, as Telkom already controls Trudon.
- Respondent
- The Commission submitted that there is no horizontal overlap between the parties, as Trudon is already controlled by Telkom. The transaction represents a change from joint to sole control and is unlikely to affect market shares or competitive dynamics. No employment or public interest concerns were identified, and no merger-specific retrenchments would occur.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, 89 of 1998
A merger that does not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition, nor raises public interest concerns, may be approved unconditionally.
- 02
Competition Tribunal precedent
Where the acquiring firm already controls the target, a change from joint to sole control is unlikely to alter market structure or competitive dynamics.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction involves Telkom acquiring the remaining shares in Trudon, a firm it already controls. There is no horizontal overlap, and the vertical relationship does not alter competitive dynamics, as the Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group pre-merger. The transaction does not raise any foreclosure concerns or result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Furthermore, the parties provided an unequivocal undertaking that no merger-specific retrenchments would occur, and the transaction does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the transaction aligns with the Government's intention of promoting Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises.
- The Commission's analysis confirmed that the transaction would not result in job duplications or employment concerns.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
- The merger between Telkom SA SOC Ltd and Trudon (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
competition tribunal
SOUTH
AFRICA
Case No: LM056Jun19
In the matter between:
Telkom SA sac Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm
and
Trudon (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firm
Panel: Norman Manoim (Presiding Member)
: Yasmin Carrim (Tribunal Member)
: lmraan Valodia (Tribunal Member)
Heard on: 10 July 2019
Order Issued on: 10 July 2019
Reasons Issued on: 22 July 2019
Reasons for Decision
Approval
[1] On 10 July 2019, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally approved the proposed transaction between Telkom SA SOC Ltd ("Telkom") and Trudon (Pty) Ltd ("Trudon").
[2] The reasons for the unconditional approval follow.
Parties to proposed transaction
Primary acquiring firm
[3] The primary acquiring firm is Telkom, a public company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa and listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange ("JSE"). Telkom is not directly or indirectly controlled by any single firm or shareholder.
[4] Telkom controls the following firms, Business Connexion Group Ltd, Gyro Group (Pty) Ltd, Gyro Properties (Pty) Ltd, Swiftnet (Pty)
Ltd and Trudon, the primary target firm in the proposed transaction.
[5] Telkom is a telecommunications service provider. It provides, inter alia, fixed and mobile telecommunication services, internet services and information communications technology ("ICT") solutions through its various divisions and subsidiaries.
[6] Telkom and all the firms controlled by it are, hereafter, collectively referred to as the Acquiring Group.
Primary target firm
[7] The primary target firm is Trudon, a private company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. Trudon is jointly controlled by Telkom, which currently holds 64.9% ofthe shares, and Trumancon Holdings (Pty) Ltd ('Trumancon"), which holds the remaining 35.1% of the shares.[1]
[8] Trudon and all the firms controlled by it are, hereafter, collectively referred to as the Target Group.
[9] As mentioned above, the Target Group is a subsidiary of the Acquiring Group and is operated as a division of the Acquiring Group.
The Target Group is a local advertising and marketing firm that provides both print services and digital solutions to local businesses under the brand name "Yellow Pages".
[10] Trudon's service offering includes the production of the Yellow Pages and White Pages directories, which are distributed on a regional and national basis. Its digital offerings include the provision of the online business directory in the form of the Yellow Pages and White Pages over the internet, the provision of website production and hosting, and the provision of social media advertising and search optimisation on Facebook, Google and Linkedln platforms.[2]
Proposed transaction and rationale
[11] The Acquiring Group intends to acquire the remaining 35.1% of the issued share capital of the Target Group, as well as certain intellectual property rights, which are currently exclusively licensed to Trudon.[3] Post implementation, the Target Group will be a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiring Group.
[12] Telkom is of the view that the proposed transaction will provide it with the opportunity to fully align Trudon's strategy with that of the Acquiring Group's. Specifically, it will allow Telkom to fully leverage Trudon's assets as an accelerator to execute the envisaged Small and Medium Business ("SMB") investment strategy.[4]
[13] The offer made by Telkom to Trumancon, a consortium of private equity investors, coincides with the typical investment life cycle
and requirement for private equity investors to periodically realise the value built up in investments.
Impact on competition
[14] The Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found that there is no horizontal overlap as the activities of the Target Group are attributable to the Acquiring Group. The Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group and the proposed transaction involves a change from joint to sole control.
[15] Accordingly, the Commission found that the proposed transaction is unlikely to change the structure of any market or lead to the accretion of any market shares.
[16] The Commission did, however, identify a vertical relationship between the merging parties as the Target Group provides directory
and digital advertising solutions to the Acquiring Group. Notwithstanding this overlap, the Commission was of the view that the
proposed transaction does not change the landscape of competitive dynamics given that the Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group, pre-merger.
[17] Accordingly, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to raise any foreclosure concerns and, in turn, unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market.
Public interest analysis
[18] The merging parties provided the Commission with an unequivocal undertaking that the proposed transaction will not result in any merger specific retrenchments.[5]
[19] Furthermore, the Commission noted that as there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the of the merging parties, the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in job duplications that may result in retrenchments.
[20] In view of the above, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in any employment concerns or any other public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[21] In light of the foregoing, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Further, the proposed transaction raised no public interest concerns. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.
___
Mr. Norman Manoim
Ms Yasmin Carrim and Prof lmraan Valodia concurring
22 July 2019
DATE
Case Manager: Helena Graham
For the merging parties: Werner Rysbergen of Webber Wentzel
For the Commission: Thabiso Poswa and Wiri Gumbie
[1] Trudon controls the following firms, Leads Machine (Pty) Ltd, Kompare (Pty) Ltd, Connecto Labs (Pty) Ltd and TDS Directory
Operations Namibia (Pty) Ltd.
[2] See p44 of the Record.
[3] See p40 of the Record.
[4] Following the Government's intention of promoting Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises ("SMME").
[5] See p10 of the Record.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.