Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Telkom SA SOC Ltd v Trudon (Pty) Ltd (LM056Jun19) [2019] ZACT 49 (22 July 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction involves Telkom acquiring the remaining shares in Trudon, a firm it already controls. There is no horizontal overlap, and the vertical relationship does not alter competitive dynamics, as the Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group pre-merger. The transaction does not raise any foreclosure concerns or result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Furthermore, the parties provided an unequivocal undertaking that no merger-specific retrenchments would occur, and the transaction does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Telkom SA SOC Ltd and Trudon (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Telkom SA SOC Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Werner Rysbergen

Trudon (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Application / Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Telkom argued that acquiring the remaining shares in Trudon would allow it to fully align Trudon's strategy with its own and leverage Trudon's assets to accelerate its Small and Medium Business investment strategy. The transaction would not result in any merger-specific retrenchments and would not alter market structure, as Telkom already controls Trudon.
Respondent
The Commission submitted that there is no horizontal overlap between the parties, as Trudon is already controlled by Telkom. The transaction represents a change from joint to sole control and is unlikely to affect market shares or competitive dynamics. No employment or public interest concerns were identified, and no merger-specific retrenchments would occur.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 89 of 1998

    A merger that does not result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition, nor raises public interest concerns, may be approved unconditionally.

  2. 02

    Competition Tribunal precedent

    Where the acquiring firm already controls the target, a change from joint to sole control is unlikely to alter market structure or competitive dynamics.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction involves Telkom acquiring the remaining shares in Trudon, a firm it already controls. There is no horizontal overlap, and the vertical relationship does not alter competitive dynamics, as the Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group pre-merger. The transaction does not raise any foreclosure concerns or result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition. Furthermore, the parties provided an unequivocal undertaking that no merger-specific retrenchments would occur, and the transaction does not raise any public interest concerns. Accordingly, the Tribunal approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the transaction aligns with the Government's intention of promoting Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises.
  • The Commission's analysis confirmed that the transaction would not result in job duplications or employment concerns.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between Telkom SA SOC Ltd and Trudon (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2019] ZACT 49

competition tribunal

SOUTH

AFRICA

Case No: LM056Jun19

In the matter between:

Telkom SA sac Ltd Primary Acquiring Firm

and

Trudon (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firm

Panel: Norman Manoim (Presiding Member)

: Yasmin Carrim (Tribunal Member)

: lmraan Valodia (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 10 July 2019

Order Issued on: 10 July 2019

Reasons Issued on: 22 July 2019

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 10 July 2019, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") unconditionally approved the proposed transaction between Telkom SA SOC Ltd ("Telkom") and Trudon (Pty) Ltd ("Trudon").

[2] The reasons for the unconditional approval follow.

Parties to proposed transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is Telkom, a public company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa and listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange ("JSE"). Telkom is not directly or indirectly controlled by any single firm or shareholder.

[4] Telkom controls the following firms, Business Connexion Group Ltd, Gyro Group (Pty) Ltd, Gyro Properties (Pty) Ltd, Swiftnet (Pty)

Ltd and Trudon, the primary target firm in the proposed transaction.

[5] Telkom is a telecommunications service provider. It provides, inter alia, fixed and mobile telecommunication services, internet services and information communications technology ("ICT") solutions through its various divisions and subsidiaries.

[6] Telkom and all the firms controlled by it are, hereafter, collectively referred to as the Acquiring Group.

Primary target firm

[7] The primary target firm is Trudon, a private company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. Trudon is jointly controlled by Telkom, which currently holds 64.9% ofthe shares, and Trumancon Holdings (Pty) Ltd ('Trumancon"), which holds the remaining 35.1% of the shares.[1]

[8] Trudon and all the firms controlled by it are, hereafter, collectively referred to as the Target Group.

[9] As mentioned above, the Target Group is a subsidiary of the Acquiring Group and is operated as a division of the Acquiring Group.

The Target Group is a local advertising and marketing firm that provides both print services and digital solutions to local businesses under the brand name "Yellow Pages".

[10] Trudon's service offering includes the production of the Yellow Pages and White Pages directories, which are distributed on a regional and national basis. Its digital offerings include the provision of the online business directory in the form of the Yellow Pages and White Pages over the internet, the provision of website production and hosting, and the provision of social media advertising and search optimisation on Facebook, Google and Linkedln platforms.[2]

Proposed transaction and rationale

[11] The Acquiring Group intends to acquire the remaining 35.1% of the issued share capital of the Target Group, as well as certain intellectual property rights, which are currently exclusively licensed to Trudon.[3] Post implementation, the Target Group will be a wholly owned subsidiary of the Acquiring Group.

[12] Telkom is of the view that the proposed transaction will provide it with the opportunity to fully align Trudon's strategy with that of the Acquiring Group's. Specifically, it will allow Telkom to fully leverage Trudon's assets as an accelerator to execute the envisaged Small and Medium Business ("SMB") investment strategy.[4]

[13] The offer made by Telkom to Trumancon, a consortium of private equity investors, coincides with the typical investment life cycle

and requirement for private equity investors to periodically realise the value built up in investments.

Impact on competition

[14] The Commission considered the activities of the merging parties and found that there is no horizontal overlap as the activities of the Target Group are attributable to the Acquiring Group. The Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group and the proposed transaction involves a change from joint to sole control.

[15] Accordingly, the Commission found that the proposed transaction is unlikely to change the structure of any market or lead to the accretion of any market shares.

[16] The Commission did, however, identify a vertical relationship between the merging parties as the Target Group provides directory

and digital advertising solutions to the Acquiring Group. Notwithstanding this overlap, the Commission was of the view that the

proposed transaction does not change the landscape of competitive dynamics given that the Acquiring Group already controls the Target Group, pre-merger.

[17] Accordingly, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to raise any foreclosure concerns and, in turn, unlikely to result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in any market.

Public interest analysis

[18] The merging parties provided the Commission with an unequivocal undertaking that the proposed transaction will not result in any merger specific retrenchments.[5]

[19] Furthermore, the Commission noted that as there is no horizontal overlap between the activities of the of the merging parties, the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in job duplications that may result in retrenchments.

[20] In view of the above, the Commission concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to result in any employment concerns or any other public interest concerns.

Conclusion

[21] In light of the foregoing, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Further, the proposed transaction raised no public interest concerns. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

___

Mr. Norman Manoim

Ms Yasmin Carrim and Prof lmraan Valodia concurring

22 July 2019

DATE

Case Manager: Helena Graham

For the merging parties: Werner Rysbergen of Webber Wentzel

For the Commission: Thabiso Poswa and Wiri Gumbie

[1] Trudon controls the following firms, Leads Machine (Pty) Ltd, Kompare (Pty) Ltd, Connecto Labs (Pty) Ltd and TDS Directory

Operations Namibia (Pty) Ltd.

[2] See p44 of the Record.

[3] See p40 of the Record.

[4] Following the Government's intention of promoting Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises ("SMME").

[5] See p10 of the Record.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.