Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd vPhembani Solar Energy 1 (Pty) Ltd and Others (LM273Jan18) [2018] ZACT 39 (13 April 2018)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction was both factually and legally linked, constituting a single, indivisible merger. There were no overlaps between the acquiring group and the target firms, as the acquiring group only held minority, non-controlling interests in other renewable energy projects. The renewable energy market is tender-based, with contracts and prices already fixed, making coordination unlikely. The transaction would not adversely affect employment, as Enel, one of the controlling entities, manages multiple projects and employees would remain unaffected. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market and raised no public interest concerns. The merger was approved unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction between Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd and the target firms is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Mmadika Moloi (Webber Wentzel)

Phembani Solar Energy 1 (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Rick van Rensburg (ENSafrica)

Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Rick van Rensburg (ENSafrica)

Phembani Renewables (Pty) Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Rick van Rensburg (ENSafrica)

Pulida Energy (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Review / Tribunal Approval and Reasons

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Thebe Renewable argued that acquiring the target firms would increase its exposure in the renewable energy sector. The transaction was presented as a single, composite deal due to cross-conditionality and unified rationale. The merging parties submitted that there would be no adverse effect on employment.
Respondent
The target firms decided to exit their renewable energy investments to focus on other ventures. They maintained that the transaction would not result in overlaps or anti-competitive effects, as the acquiring group held only minority, non-controlling interests in other renewable energy projects. The Commission supported that no job losses would occur.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 89 of 1998

    A merger must be assessed as a single transaction when there are factual and legal links, including cross-conditionality and unified rationale.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, 89 of 1998, section 12A

    A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.

  3. 03

    Competition Act, 89 of 1998, section 12A(3)

    Public interest factors, such as employment effects, must be considered in merger assessments.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction was both factually and legally linked, constituting a single, indivisible merger. There were no overlaps between the acquiring group and the target firms, as the acquiring group only held minority, non-controlling interests in other renewable energy projects. The renewable energy market is tender-based, with contracts and prices already fixed, making coordination unlikely. The transaction would not adversely affect employment, as Enel, one of the controlling entities, manages multiple projects and employees would remain unaffected. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market and raised no public interest concerns. The merger was approved unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the renewable energy market's structure and regulatory framework, including tender processes and price caps, further reduce the risk of anti-competitive coordination.
  • The Tribunal observed that the employment impact was negligible due to the diversified operations of Enel and the absence of anticipated job losses.

Court disposition

The proposed merger is approved unconditionally.

  • The proposed transaction between Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd and the target firms is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2018] ZACT 39

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH

AFRICA

Case No: LM273Jan18

In the matter between:

Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Primary Acquiring Firm

and

Phembani Solar Energy 1 (Pty) Ltd

Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy (Pty) Ltd

Phembani Renewables (Pty) LtdPulida Energy (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Primary Target Firms

Panel

: Yasmin Carrim (Presiding Member)

: Medi Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

: Fiona Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

Heard on

: 14 March 2018

Order Issued on : 14 March 2018

Reasons Issued on : 13 April 2018

Reasons for Decision

Approval

[1] On 14 March 2018, the Competition Tribunal ("Tribunal") approved the proposed transaction between Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd and Phembani Solar Energy 1 (Pty) Ltd, Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy (Pty) ltd, Phembani Renewables (Pty) Ltd, and Pulida Energy (RF) (Pty) ltd.

[2] The reasons for approving the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to proposed transaction

Primary acquiring firm

[3] The primary acquiring firm is Thebe Renewable Energy Holdings (RF) (Pty) Ltd ("Thebe Renewable"), a private company incorporated in accordance with the laws of South Africa. Thebe Renewable is a wholly owned subsidiary of Thebe Investment Corporation ("TIC"),

which itself is controlled by a number of firms.

[4] TIC is an investment holding company that manages investment portfolios in various industries. Of relevance to the proposed transaction are TIC's investments in the energy industry. In the energy industry, TIC operates through Thebe Renewable, which holds and manages the entire group's renewable energy (solar energy and wind energy) investments through special purpose ring-fenced investment companies. Thebe Renewable has a minority (non-control conferring) shareholding in a number of renewable energy projects.

Primary target firms

[5] The primary target firms are Phembani Solar Energy 1 (Ply) Ltd ("Phembani Solar"), Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy (Pty) Ltd ("Shanduka Black Umbrellas"), Phembani Renewables (Pty) Ltd ("Phembani Renewables"), and Pulida Energy (RF) (Pty) Ltd ("Pulida"), collectively referred to as the Target Firms.

[6] The Target Firms are special purpose companies created by the sellers to hold shareholding interests in two renewable energy projects namely; the Nobelsfontein Wind Project and the Pulida Solar Park Project.

[7] Phembani Solar and Phembani Renewables are wholly owned subsidiaries of Phembani Energy (Pty) Ltd ("Phembani Energy"). Phembani Energy is ultimately controlled by the Phembani Group (Pty) Ltd ("Phembani Group").[1]

[8] Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy is controlled by Shanduka Black Umbrellas B­BBEE Investment Trust ("Shanduka 8-BBEE Trust").[2]

[9] Pulida Energy is controlled by Enel Green Power RSA (Pty) Ltd ("Enel Green Power"). Enel Green Power is ultimately controlled by Enel S.p.A, a public company listed on the Borsa ltaliana. Other shareholders in Pulida Energy include Phembani Solar and Shanduka

Black Umbrellas Energy.

[10] Given that Thebe Renewable will acquire both Phembani Solar and Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy and their shareholding in Pulida Energy, this implies that Thebe Renewable will acquire negative control in Pulida Energy.

Proposed transaction and rationale

Primary acquiring firm

[11] Thebe Renewable submitted that the Target Firms presented the primary acquiring firm with the opportunity to increase its exposure in the renewable energy industry.

Primary target firm

[12] The Target Firms had made the strategic decision to exit their renewable energy investments to focus on other investments.

[13] In terms of the proposed transaction, Thebe Renewable intends to acquire direct control over Phembani Solar, Phembani Renewables and Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy as well as indirect control in Pulida Energy.

[14] The merging parties submitted that the proposed transaction comprises of a single and composite transaction from both a factual and legal point of view. This is because the acquiring firm's rationale for the various transactions is the same. Further, the various transactional agreements provides for the cross-conditionality of each acquisition. The Commission considered whether there was a factual link as well as a legal link between the proposed transactions.

[15] The Commission found that the ultimate target firms are the Nobelsfontein Wind Project and the Pulida Solar Park Project. The Target Firms are special purpose companies created by the sellers to hold the shareholding interests in the ultimate target firms. In order for Thebe Renewable to acquire the ultimate target firms as intended, it needed to acquire the special purpose companies i.e. the Target Firms.

[16] The Commission concluded that there is a link between the Target Firms in that both Phembani Solar and Phembani Renewables are controlled by the same holding company, Phembani Energy. The Commission noted that although Shanduka Black Umbrellas is controlled by a different shareholder, Phembani Solar and Shanduka Black Umbrellas are common shareholders in Pulida Energy (the holding company for the Pulida Solar Project).

[17] Further, the Commission found that there was a legal link between the transactions as the proposed merger between Thebe Renewable, Phembani Solar and Phembani Renewables will not take place without a sale agreement having been signed by Thebe Renewable and the Shanduka 8-BBEE Trust for the sale of Shanduka Black Umbrellas Energy and vice versa.

[18] The Commission thus concluded that the transactions are both factually and legally linked and should be considered as one indivisible

transaction.

Impact on competition

[19] The Commission found that there were no overlaps arising out of the transaction. Although the acquiring group holds interests in

renewable energy projects, none of these interest confer control, as such there is no overlap between the acquiring group and the Target Firms.

[20] The Commission did consider whether the transaction was likely to enhance or create a platform for coordination. This is because the renewable energy projects have one customer (Eskom) and Thebe Renewable is able to appoint at least one director in all its renewable energy projects.

[21] In this regard, the Commission found that coordination was unlikely to result from the transaction. The target projects are already in existence and have already signed Purchase Power Agreements and Implementation Agreements with Eskom and the Department of Energy

("DOE"). The prices to Eskom and escalation rates have already been agreed to when these contracts were signed.

[22] The Commission also found that the renewable energy market is tender based and the DOE decides the maximum capacity (MW) available for tender per technology and price caps per technology to ensure that bid tariffs are within acceptable limits. For every tender bidders must submit a proposal that will involve establishing a new renewable energy power generation facility, in line with the requirements of the tender and/or the socio-economic objectives of the DOE.

Public interest

[23] The merging parties submitted that the proposed transaction will have no adverse effect on employment.[3]

[24] The Commission noted that Enel manages a number of projects besides the Pulida Project, thus regardless of what happens to the Pulida

Project, Enel's employees should remain unaffected and no job losses are likely to occur as there are other projects for its employees to manage at Enel.

Conclusion

[25] In light of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Ms Yasmin Carrim

Mrs Medi Mokuena and Prof. Fiona Tregenna concurring

13 April 2018

Case Manager: Kameel Pancham

For the merging parties: Mmadika Moloi from Webber Wentzel on behalf of Thebe

Renewable Energy Holdings

Rick van Rensburg from ENSafrica on behalf of

Phembani Renewables and Shanduka Black Umbrellas

For the Commission: Billy Mabatamela and Raksha Darji

[1] The Phembani Group is controlled by Mr Phuthuma Nhleko through a number of firms.

[2] The Shanduka B-BBEE Trustees are: Allan John Hannie, Brian John Stephenson Wilkinson and Yvonne Nokukhanya Themba.

[3] Inter alia Commission's Recommendation page 23.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.