Trustees, National Bioinformatics Network Trust v Jacobs and Others (C249/09) [2009] ZALC 35; [2009] 8 BLLR 833 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 2513 (LC) (14 April 2009)
The Labour Court dismissed the urgent application for an interdict restraining the commissioner from continuing with arbitration proceedings. The court held that intervention in uncompleted arbitration is only justified in rare cases of grave injustice, which was not established here. The applicant failed to show a prima facie right to relief, as both parties were equally affected by the absence of legal representation and the commissioner was required to conduct proceedings informally and fairly. The complexity and public interest in the matter did not warrant urgent intervention, and the applicant would have an opportunity to challenge the commissioner's decisions after the arbitration...
- Citation
- [2009] ZALC 35
- Parties
- Applicant: Trustees for the time being of the National Bioinformatics Network Trust; Respondent: Daniel Allan Jacobson; Respondent: NR Mazwi N.O.; Respondent: The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2009
- Case Number
- C249/09
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Relief to Stay CCMA Arbitration Pending Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Urgent Interdict, Legal Representation in Arbitration, Ccma Rules, Review of Interlocutory Rulings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trustees for the time being of the National Bioinformatics Network Trust
Applicant
Daniel Allan Jacobson
Respondent
NR Mazwi N.O.
Respondent
The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interim Relief to Stay CCMA Arbitration Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court should grant an urgent interdict restraining the commissioner from continuing with CCMA arbitration pending review of interlocutory rulings.
- 2 Whether the refusal of legal representation and recusal by the commissioner justifies intervention before the arbitration is completed.
- 3 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie right to the relief sought.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court dismissed the urgent application for an interdict restraining the commissioner from continuing with arbitration proceedings. The court held that intervention in uncompleted arbitration is only justified in rare cases of grave injustice, which was not established here. The applicant failed to show a prima facie right to relief, as both parties were equally affected by the absence of legal representation and the commissioner was required to conduct proceedings informally and fairly. The complexity and public interest in the matter did not warrant urgent intervention, and the applicant would have an opportunity to challenge the commissioner's decisions after the arbitration...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The urgent application is dismissed.
- The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment