Tshaka N O and Others v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited and Another (141/2019) [2020] ZASCA 73 (25 June 2020)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the bank was not negligent in authorising the transfers from the Trust's account. The bank acted on instructions from the authorised signatories as mandated by the Trust's resolution and application. When allegations of fraud were raised, the bank requested a written instruction signed by all trustees to stop further transfers, but no such instruction was forthcoming. The court found that the Trust failed to establish that the bank breached its duty of care or acted outside its mandate. The delay by the trustees in providing a stop instruction was unexplained, and the bank's conduct was consistent with its obligations under the mandate. Accordingly,...
- Citation
- [2020] ZASCA 73
- Parties
- Appellant: Kgomotso S. Tshaka NO; Appellant: Margaret M. Monnakgotla NO; Appellant: Jabulani B. Gumbi NO; Appellant: Wenliang Ma NO; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa Limited; Respondent: Bakubung Economic Development Unit
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2020
- Case Number
- 141/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Ponnan, Mbha, Mocumie, Nicholls, Matojane
- Legal Topics
- Mandate of Bank, Trustee Joint Action, Negligence, Resolution Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kgomotso S. Tshaka NO
Appellant
Margaret M. Monnakgotla NO
Appellant
Jabulani B. Gumbi NO
Appellant
Wenliang Ma NO
Appellant
Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
Respondent
Bakubung Economic Development Unit
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bank was negligent in authorising transfers from the Trust's account without a resolution passed by all trustees.
- 2 Whether the bank was obliged to act only on instructions signed by all trustees.
- 3 Whether the Trust established liability against the bank for the transferred funds.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the bank was not negligent in authorising the transfers from the Trust's account. The bank acted on instructions from the authorised signatories as mandated by the Trust's resolution and application. When allegations of fraud were raised, the bank requested a written instruction signed by all trustees to stop further transfers, but no such instruction was forthcoming. The court found that the Trust failed to establish that the bank breached its duty of care or acted outside its mandate. The delay by the trustees in providing a stop instruction was unexplained, and the bank's conduct was consistent with its obligations under the mandate. Accordingly,...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment