Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Reenen Ranch CC v Van den Heever and Others (6311/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 114 (11 April 2025)
The High Court dismissed an eviction application because the close corporation had not properly authorised the litigation before it was launched.
Setsoto Local Municipality v Moeletsane and Others (1227/2023) [2024] ZAFSHC 384 (29 November 2024)
The High Court dismissed a municipality’s bid to cancel a deed of transfer, and also dismissed a postponement request, because the matter was unauthorised and based on hearsay.
Devrog Family Trust v Future Indefinite Investments 180 (PTY) Ltd; Devrog Family Trust and Others v Future Indefinite Investments 180 (PTY) Ltd and Another (2021/6789) [2022] ZAGPJHC 778 (13 October 2022)
The High Court granted leave to appeal on whether the trust was validly bound and whether Covid-related supervening impossibility justified cancellation.
Tshaka N O and Others v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited and Another (141/2019) [2020] ZASCA 73 (25 June 2020)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Standard Bank was not negligent in paying out trust funds on instructions from authorised signatories.
Body Corporate of the Peaks Sectional Title Scheme v Prinsloo NO and Another (7729/2012) [2012] ZAWCHC 201 (20 September 2012)
The High Court dismissed a provisional sequestration application because the body corporate had not proved a liquidated claim under the Insolvency Act.
Steyn NO and Others v Blockpave (Pty) Ltd (2959/2010) [2010] ZAFSHC 134 (12 October 2010)
The court found that the Dries Steyn Trust was not properly before the court because no valid resolution was taken by the full complement of trustees to institute proceedings against the respondent. The minutes relied upon did not evidence a decision to sue, nor was there a written resolution signed by all trustees as required by the trust deed. The absence and subsequent resignation of the third trustee rendered the trust incapable of acting, as the minimum number of trustees required by the trust deed was not met and the replacement trustee had not yet been authorised by the Master. The spe…
Source excerpt
Explore more
