Tshiki and Another v Buffalo City Metro Municipality and Another (CA302/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 122 (15 November 2018)
The court found that there was no evidence supporting the allegation that the first appellant contracted in his personal capacity; all documentation and correspondence were addressed to the second appellant, a corporate entity. The second appellant, however, was deregistered as a company at the relevant times and had not been re-registered, resulting in a lack of legal capacity to contract or sue for damages. The court held that the trial judge was correct in concluding that the second appellant had no locus standi and that the first appellant did not contract personally. The defence of res iudicata was rejected, as previous proceedings were dismissed on procedural grounds and did not...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAECGHC 122
- Parties
- Appellant: Mpeleki Tshiki; Appellant: Tshiki & Sons Incorporated; Respondent: Buffalo City Metro Municipality; Respondent: West Restitution Association (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2018
- Case Number
- CA302/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Ntlama Aj, Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where utilised.
- Judges
- Lowe, Pickering, Nqumse
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Contract of Mandate, Deregistration of Company, Res Iudicata, Municipal Procurement, Damages for Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mpeleki Tshiki
Appellant
Tshiki & Sons Incorporated
Appellant
Buffalo City Metro Municipality
Respondent
West Restitution Association (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Ntlama Aj, Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contract of mandate for conveyancing services was concluded between the appellants and the respondents.
- 2 Whether the first appellant contracted in his personal capacity or only through the second appellant.
- 3 Whether the second appellant, as a deregistered company, had locus standi to claim damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence supporting the allegation that the first appellant contracted in his personal capacity; all documentation and correspondence were addressed to the second appellant, a corporate entity. The second appellant, however, was deregistered as a company at the relevant times and had not been re-registered, resulting in a lack of legal capacity to contract or sue for damages. The court held that the trial judge was correct in concluding that the second appellant had no locus standi and that the first appellant did not contract personally. The defence of res iudicata was rejected, as previous proceedings were dismissed on procedural grounds and did not...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel where utilised.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, such costs to include the costs of two counsel where utilised.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment