Twelve Apostles Church in Christ and Another v Twelve Apostles' Church in Christ and Others (8049-12; 8050-12; 10263-12) [2017] ZAKZDHC 41 (12 October 2017)
The court found that the applicants failed to establish valid long-term leases entitling them to occupation of the properties, as the respondents proved on a balance of probabilities that the mother church (first respondent) held prior rights of occupation, formalised by PTOs issued by traditional authorities. The evidence demonstrated that the mother church acquired oral and subsequently written permission to occupy and develop the properties before any leases were concluded. The applicants, as a separate entity, could not acquire rights over the properties that were always retained by the mother church. The Ingonyama Trust Act prohibits infringement of existing rights, and the ITB's...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAKZDHC 41
- Parties
- Applicant: The Twelve Apostles Church in Christ; Applicant: Naphtali Vusumzi Mlangeni; Respondent: The Twelve Apostles' Church in Christ; Respondent: Caesar Nongqunga; Respondent: Ingonyama Trust Board
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2017
- Case Number
- 8049/12; 8050/12; 10263/12
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Consolidated Hearing of Three Eviction Applications and Counter Application
- Outcome
- Applications for ejectment refused; counter-application granted; leases declared invalid; costs awarded against applicants.
- Judges
- Moodley
- Legal Topics
- Permission to Occupy, Long Term Leases, Misjoinder, Non Joinder, Ingonyama Trust Act, Eviction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Twelve Apostles Church in Christ
Applicant
Naphtali Vusumzi Mlangeni
Applicant
The Twelve Apostles' Church in Christ
Respondent
Caesar Nongqunga
Respondent
Ingonyama Trust Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Consolidated Hearing of Three Eviction Applications and Counter Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants hold valid long-term leases entitling them to occupation and possession of the disputed properties.
- 2 Whether the respondents hold prior Permission to Occupy (PTO) rights over the properties that would invalidate the leases or entitle them to remain in occupation.
- 3 Whether there was material non-joinder of the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to establish valid long-term leases entitling them to occupation of the properties, as the respondents proved on a balance of probabilities that the mother church (first respondent) held prior rights of occupation, formalised by PTOs issued by traditional authorities. The evidence demonstrated that the mother church acquired oral and subsequently written permission to occupy and develop the properties before any leases were concluded. The applicants, as a separate entity, could not acquire rights over the properties that were always retained by the mother church. The Ingonyama Trust Act prohibits infringement of existing rights, and the ITB's...
Court Disposition
Applications for ejectment refused; counter-application granted; leases declared invalid; costs awarded against applicants.
Orders
- The applications for the ejectment of the respondents in cases 8049/2012, 8050/2012 and 10263/2012 are refused.
- The first and second applicants are directed to pay the costs of the first respondent jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment