Mandeni Municipality v Independent Ethiopian Church of South Africa and Another (10273/2015) [2025] ZAKZDHC 36 (4 June 2025)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
10273/2015
Judge
Mahabeer AJ
Leave to appeal was dismissed because the municipality failed to show a right to evict from either property and its bias allegations were unsubstantiated.
Mpheleng Communal Property Association v Kgoshigadi Mathebe of Bantwane Traditional Community and Others (LCC03/2021B) [2025] ZALCC 24 (3 June 2025)
Court
Land Claims Court
Case number
LCC03/2021B
Judge
WJ du Plessis
The court found that not all respondents were bound by the original court order, as some were not cited parties. The Bantwana Traditional Council, as a collective entity, cannot be held in contempt without identifying a specific individual responsible for wilful disobedience. The process of registering the PTO in Mr Aphane's name, following a sale, constituted a fresh allocation of land rights and fell within the scope of the interdict. However, the respondents did not act mala fide, as they genuinely believed their conduct was lawful and outside the ambit of the order. The meaning of 'alloca…
Maboe v Zion Christian Church (Appeal) (HCA30/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 98 (15 May 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
HCA30/2024
Judges
Naude-Odendaal, Nkoana
The High Court dismissed an appeal against an eviction order, holding that PIE did not apply because the property was used for a lodge, not residential occupation.
Department of Economic Development and Environment Affairs v Boyana and Another (5123/2022) [2024] ZAECMHC 20 (23 April 2024)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
5123/2022
Judge
L Rusi
The applicant established that the land in question falls within the protected coastal conservation area as defined by Decree 9 of 1992. The respondent failed to produce a valid permission to occupy or evidence of a lawful transfer of rights under Proclamation 26 of 1936. The affidavits and supporting documents provided by the respondent were insufficient, lacking confirmation from the Department of Agriculture or proper registration. The respondent's constitutional arguments were not properly pleaded and cannot be sustained. The applicant demonstrated a clear right to protect the conservatio…
Norman Ndongeni v Thembisa Ndongeni and 3 Others (CA28/23) [2024] ZAECMHC 8 (30 January 2024)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
CA28/23
Judges
Nhlangulela, Majiki, Tilana-Mabece
The majority held that the appellant's PTO, issued by the competent authority and not set aside by a court, confers exclusive occupational rights to the property. The first respondent's failure to serve the counter-application on the third respondent and to invoke administrative review under PAJA was fatal to her challenge of the PTO's validity. The property was not registered in the mother's name, nor was it allotted to her, and the PTO did not extend occupational rights to siblings. The first respondent's claim to the property as a common home did not override the appellant's rights under t…