Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Van Den Berg (44078/2012) [2013] ZAGPPHC 151 (12 June 2013)
The respondent failed to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements essential to the legal profession, including practising without a fidelity fund certificate, failing to submit auditor's reports, not notifying the Law Society of his change of address, and failing to respond to correspondence. These actions constitute unprofessional conduct and place the public and trust creditors at risk. The court, exercising its discretion, found that the respondent is not a fit and proper person to continue practising as an attorney. The seriousness of practising without a fidelity fund certificate and the failure to maintain proper accounting records justified the respondent's removal from...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAGPPHC 151
- Parties
- Applicant: The Law Society of the Northern Provinces; Respondent: Samuel Jacobus Van Den Berg
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2013
- Case Number
- 44078/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- The respondent is removed from the roll of attorneys and a curator bonis is appointed to administer his trust accounts. Costs are awarded against the respondent on an attorney and client scale.
- Judges
- P.Z. Ebersohn, T.A. Maumela
- Legal Topics
- Attorneys Act, Professional Misconduct, Fidelity Fund Certificate, Failure to Keep Accounting Records, Unprofessional Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Law Society of the Northern Provinces
Applicant
Samuel Jacobus Van Den Berg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is a fit and proper person to continue practising as an attorney.
- 2 Whether the respondent's conduct warrants removal from the roll of attorneys.
- 3 Whether the respondent's failure to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements constitutes unprofessional conduct.
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements essential to the legal profession, including practising without a fidelity fund certificate, failing to submit auditor's reports, not notifying the Law Society of his change of address, and failing to respond to correspondence. These actions constitute unprofessional conduct and place the public and trust creditors at risk. The court, exercising its discretion, found that the respondent is not a fit and proper person to continue practising as an attorney. The seriousness of practising without a fidelity fund certificate and the failure to maintain proper accounting records justified the respondent's removal from...
Court Disposition
The respondent is removed from the roll of attorneys and a curator bonis is appointed to administer his trust accounts. Costs are awarded against the respondent on an attorney and client scale.
Orders
- The name of Samuel Jacobus Van Den Berg is removed from the roll of attorneys.
- The respondent must immediately surrender his certificate of enrolment to the Registrar of the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment