South African Legal Practice Council v Kgaphola and Another (795/2023)
South African Legal Practice Council v Kgaphola and Another (795/2023) [2025] ZASCA 66 (23 May 2025)
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the respondent practised as an attorney without a valid fidelity fund certificate for specified periods, failed to comply with rules regarding trust banking details and location, paid membership fees late, failed to register with the Financial Intelligence Centre within the prescribed period, and failed to reply to correspondence from the Legal Practice Council. These infractions were established on a balance of probabilities. Practising without a fidelity fund certificate and failing to reply to Council correspondence are serious offences that may warra…
Source excerpt
- Professional Misconduct
- Legal Practitioners Regulation
- Fidelity Fund Certificate
- Failure To Reply To Council
- Disciplinary Sanctions