Cancellation of order for special order tools - financial difficulties: Supplier not obliged to accept cancellation (2013114179) [2014] ZACGSO 3 (4 February 2014)
The Ombud found that the tools ordered by the complainant constituted a special order as defined in the Consumer Protection Act. Section 17 does not entitle a consumer to cancel a contract for special-order goods, and the supplier is not legally obliged to accept cancellation or refund the deposit. The contract between the parties was valid and binding, and the supplier had already incurred costs to import the goods. There is no legal basis for instructing the supplier to cancel the agreement or refund the deposit.
- Citation
- [2014] ZACGSO 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Complainant; Respondent: Supplier (E)
- Court
- Consumer Goods and Services Ombud
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 February 2014
- Case Number
- 2013114179
- Procedural Posture
- Consumer Complaint / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed; no recommendation in favour of the complainant.
- Judges
- Bonita Hughes
- Legal Topics
- Consumer Protection Act, Special Order Goods, Contract Cancellation, Refund Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Complainant
Applicant
Supplier (E)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consumer Complaint / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant is entitled to cancel the contract for special order tools due to financial difficulties.
- 2 Whether the supplier is obliged to refund the deposit paid by the complainant.
- 3 Whether section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act applies to special order goods in this context.
Ratio Decidendi
The Ombud found that the tools ordered by the complainant constituted a special order as defined in the Consumer Protection Act. Section 17 does not entitle a consumer to cancel a contract for special-order goods, and the supplier is not legally obliged to accept cancellation or refund the deposit. The contract between the parties was valid and binding, and the supplier had already incurred costs to import the goods. There is no legal basis for instructing the supplier to cancel the agreement or refund the deposit.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed; no recommendation in favour of the complainant.
Orders
- The supplier is not obliged to refund the deposit of R17,000.00.
- The contract remains valid and binding between the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment