Snap-On Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others v Joubert and Others (41993/2012C) [2015] ZAGPPHC 821; 2016 BIP 301 (GP) (7 December 2015)
The court found that the applicants established copyright in the software, camera software, database, and operations manual associated with the John Bean 3D Wheel Aligner. The works were original, created by qualified persons in the course of employment, and thus the applicants were the owners of the copyright. The respondents imported and sold Europa Wheel Aligners that unlawfully incorporated these copyrighted works, constituting infringement under the Copyright Act and rendering the goods counterfeit under the Counterfeit Goods Act. The applicants were entitled to interdicts restraining further infringement, delivery-up of infringing and counterfeit goods, and an enquiry into damages...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 821
- Parties
- Applicant: Snap-On Africa (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Snap-On Inc.; Applicant: Snap-On Equipment Inc.; Applicant: Snap-On Equipment Europe Ltd; Respondent: Sean Joubert; Respondent: SO Equipment Gauteng North (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Equipment Africa; Respondent: Integrated Marketing (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2015
- Case Number
- 41993/2012C
- Procedural Posture
- Main Application / Judgment on Merits of Main Application
- Outcome
- Application granted in favour of the applicants against the first to third respondents; relief as prayed in the notice of motion.
- Judges
- Mabuse
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Counterfeit Goods Act, Originality of Works, Ownership of Copyright, Unlawful Competition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Snap-On Africa (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Snap-On Inc.
Applicant
Snap-On Equipment Inc.
Applicant
Snap-On Equipment Europe Ltd
Applicant
Sean Joubert
Respondent
SO Equipment Gauteng North (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Equipment Africa
Respondent
Integrated Marketing (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Main Application / Judgment on Merits of Main Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have established copyright in respect of their equipment.
- 2 Whether the respondents have knowingly infringed the applicants' copyright in the John Bean 3D Wheel Aligner.
- 3 Whether the goods delivered up are counterfeit goods under the Counterfeit Goods Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants established copyright in the software, camera software, database, and operations manual associated with the John Bean 3D Wheel Aligner. The works were original, created by qualified persons in the course of employment, and thus the applicants were the owners of the copyright. The respondents imported and sold Europa Wheel Aligners that unlawfully incorporated these copyrighted works, constituting infringement under the Copyright Act and rendering the goods counterfeit under the Counterfeit Goods Act. The applicants were entitled to interdicts restraining further infringement, delivery-up of infringing and counterfeit goods, and an enquiry into damages...
Court Disposition
Application granted in favour of the applicants against the first to third respondents; relief as prayed in the notice of motion.
Orders
- The respondents are interdicted and restrained from infringing the applicants' copyright in the aligner software, camera software, database, and operations manual.
- The respondents must deliver up infringing copies of the aligner software, camera software, databases, and operations manuals to the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment