Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual Property [2018] ZAGPPHC 16

Claasen and Another v TEC Novation Solution (Pty) Limited and Another (2017/40521)

Claasen and Another v TEC Novation Solution (Pty) Limited and Another (2017/40521) [2018] ZAGPPHC 16 (16 February 2018)

The court dismissed a copyright interdict application because the applicants failed to identify the protected works, prove originality, or show infringement.

  • Copyright Infringement
  • Subsistence Of Copyright
  • Ownership Of Copyright
  • Identification Of Protected Work
  • Interdict Requirements
  • Copyright-infringement
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2015] ZAGPPHC 821

Snap-On Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others v Joubert and Others (41993/2012C)

Snap-On Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others v Joubert and Others (41993/2012C) [2015] ZAGPPHC 821; 2016 BIP 301 (GP) (7 December 2015)

The High Court held that the applicants proved copyright in software, database and manual for a wheel aligner, and granted interdicts and counterfeit-goods relief.

  • Copyright Infringement
  • Counterfeit Goods Act
  • Originality Of Works
  • Ownership Of Copyright
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Copyright-infringement
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2002] ZASCA 11

Biotech Laboratories (Pty) Ltd v Beecham Group Plc and Another (494/2000)

Biotech Laboratories (Pty) Ltd v Beecham Group Plc and Another (494/2000) [2002] ZASCA 11; 2002 (4) SA 249 (SCA); [2002] 3 All SA 652 (SCA) (25 March 2002)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the package insert for Augmentin is an original literary work within the meaning of the Copyright Act, as it was compiled using skill and judgment by Smith-Kline Beecham's staff. The fact that the insert incorporated prior material and underwent amendments during the Medicines Control Council's approval process did not detract from its originality. The Court found that the MCC did not direct or control the creation of the insert, but merely approved its compliance with regulatory requirements. Therefore, copyright does not vest in the State under section…

  • Copyright Originality
  • State Copyright
  • Package Insert
  • Compilation
  • Ownership Of Copyright
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.