Extra Dimensions 121 (Pty) Limited v Body Corporate of Marine Sands and Another (AR121/2017) [2018] ZAKZPHC 69 (24 August 2018)
The court held that the body corporate, by passing a special resolution that modified the liability of sectional owners to contribute towards levies, acted outside its statutory powers under the Sectional Titles Act. The modification of levy contributions should have been effected through a management rule, requiring a unanimous resolution, not a conduct rule adopted by special resolution. The scheme cannot have two different schedules of participation quotas, and the absence of a unanimous resolution was fatal. The conduct rule introduced was in conflict with section 37(1)(d) and therefore invalid. Consequently, the resolution and related amendments were declared invalid and of no force...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAKZPHC 69
- Parties
- Appellant: Extra Dimensions 121 (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Body Corporate of Marine Sands; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Pietermaritzburg
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2018
- Case Number
- AR121/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Masipa Aj; Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; order of the court a quo set aside and substituted.
- Judges
- Steyn, Van Zÿl, Ploos van Amstel
- Legal Topics
- Sectional Titles Act, Participation Quota, Levy Contributions, Ultra Vires Resolution, Management Vs Conduct Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Extra Dimensions 121 (Pty) Limited
Appellant
Body Corporate of Marine Sands
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Pietermaritzburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Masipa Aj; Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the special resolution passed by the body corporate modifying levy contributions was ultra vires the Sectional Titles Act and therefore invalid.
- 2 Whether the body corporate could lawfully amend participation quotas via a conduct rule rather than a management rule.
- 3 Whether the absence of a unanimous resolution rendered the modification of levy contributions invalid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the body corporate, by passing a special resolution that modified the liability of sectional owners to contribute towards levies, acted outside its statutory powers under the Sectional Titles Act. The modification of levy contributions should have been effected through a management rule, requiring a unanimous resolution, not a conduct rule adopted by special resolution. The scheme cannot have two different schedules of participation quotas, and the absence of a unanimous resolution was fatal. The conduct rule introduced was in conflict with section 37(1)(d) and therefore invalid. Consequently, the resolution and related amendments were declared invalid and of no force...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; order of the court a quo set aside and substituted.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs.
- The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted with: The special resolution passed by the first respondent on 23 August 2012 that modified the members' liability for levy contributions of the Marine Sands Sectional Scheme is declared invalid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment