City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v South African Local Government Bargaining Council and Others (JR1706/17) [2021] ZALCJHB 390 (19 October 2021)
The court found that the arbitrator did not commit a reviewable irregularity in refusing the postponement, as the applicant failed to provide medical certificates for its absent witnesses and the arbitrator exercised his discretion judicially. The arbitrator's finding that the employee had applied for the position was reasonable, given the evidence before him. However, the arbitrator erred in calculating compensation based on the employee's salary as at April 2017 rather than August 2014, which constituted a material error of law and misconduct. Consequently, the award of compensation was set aside and the matter remitted for proper computation by a different arbitrator.
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 390
- Parties
- Applicant: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council; Respondent: Magale Lazarus Matlala N.O.; Respondent: IMATU obo Mirriam Mhlongo
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2021
- Case Number
- JR1706/17
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review and Condonation
- Outcome
- Review application granted in part; arbitration award set aside and matter remitted for computation of compensation by a different arbitrator.
- Judges
- D Mahosi
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Labour Practice, Review of Arbitration Award, Condonation, Compensation Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Applicant
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Magale Lazarus Matlala N.O.
Respondent
IMATU obo Mirriam Mhlongo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review and Condonation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator committed gross irregularities or misconduct in the arbitration proceedings.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator erred in refusing the applicant's postponement request due to absent witnesses.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator failed to properly consider evidence regarding the employee's application for the advertised position.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the arbitrator did not commit a reviewable irregularity in refusing the postponement, as the applicant failed to provide medical certificates for its absent witnesses and the arbitrator exercised his discretion judicially. The arbitrator's finding that the employee had applied for the position was reasonable, given the evidence before him. However, the arbitrator erred in calculating compensation based on the employee's salary as at April 2017 rather than August 2014, which constituted a material error of law and misconduct. Consequently, the award of compensation was set aside and the matter remitted for proper computation by a different arbitrator.
Court Disposition
Review application granted in part; arbitration award set aside and matter remitted for computation of compensation by a different arbitrator.
Orders
- Condonation for the late filing of the review application is granted.
- The arbitration award issued under case PMD101417 dated 11 May 2017 is reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment