Shah and Others v Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform and Others (LCC93/2014) [2024] ZALCC 41 (6 December 2024)
Court
Land Claims Court
Case number
LCC93/2014
Judges
Ncube, Mike Gibbins
Land Claims Court awarded the Shah family R13,666,035 in restitution compensation, including solatium, and ordered attorney-and-client costs against the State.
Jewellery Council of South Africa v Maharaj and Others (JR2527/21) [2024] ZALCJHB 236 (30 May 2024)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
JR2527/21
Judge
M Makhura
Labour Court upheld a CCMA finding of substantively unfair dismissal, but corrected compensation to be calculated at the employee’s reduced salary at dismissal.
Makate v Joosub N.O and Another (57882/2019) [2022] ZAGPPHC 55; [2022] 2 All SA 226 (GP) (7 February 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
57882/2019
Judge
Hughes
The High Court reviewed and set aside Vodacom CEO Shameel Joosub’s compensation determination for Kenneth Makate’s Please Call Me idea and remitted it for fresh determination.
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v South African Local Government Bargaining Council and Others (JR1706/17) [2021] ZALCJHB 390 (19 October 2021)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
JR1706/17
Judge
D Mahosi
Review of an unfair labour practice award partly succeeded: the Labour Court set aside the compensation award and remitted the matter for recalculation.
The Constitutional Court upheld a partial appeal on back pay after unfair dismissal, correcting the Labour Court’s use of wrong salary figures and earnings data.
Jacobs and Others v Department of Land Affairs and Others (LCC3/98) [2016] ZALCC 14; 2016 (5) SA 382 (LCC) (13 June 2016)
Court
Land Claims Court
Case number
LCC 3/98
Judges
Ngcukaitobi, Mpshe
The court found that the claimants, as direct descendants of Abraham and Elizabeth September, were dispossessed of rights in the farm Uap after 19 June 1913. Although the registration of title occurred in 1907, the September family continued to occupy and assert rights in the land until their forced eviction in 1921. The dispossession was facilitated by fraudulent conduct, exploitation of illiteracy, and official indifference, all underpinned by prevailing racial discrimination. The court held that the dispossession fell within the ambit of section 2(1)(c) of the Restitution Act and section 2…
Sutherland Transport v National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight and Logistics Industry and Others (P102/12) [2014] ZALCPE 21 (5 August 2014)
Court
Labour Court Port Elizabeth
Case number
P102/12
Judge
C Prinsloo
The Labour Court upheld a review dismissal in an incapacity case, holding the arbitrator reasonably found the employer failed to properly investigate the employee’s ill-health.