Van der Merwe v Road Accident Fund (1661/04) [2005] ZAGPHC 120; 2006 (3) SA 88 (T) (22 November 2005)
Section 17(5) of the Road Accident Fund Act does not create a separate right of action for suppliers that is independent of the third party's claim. The supplier's claim is statutorily ceded from the third party and is subject to all the same limitations, including prescription. The cause of action for both the third party and the supplier arises at the time of the accident, not when the service is rendered. Since neither the third party nor the supplier lodged a claim within three years from the date of the accident, both claims have prescribed. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- [2005] ZAGPHC 120
- Parties
- Appellant: C J Van der Merwe; Respondent: Road Accident Fund
- Court
- High Courts - Gauteng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2005
- Case Number
- 1661/04
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- WJ Hartzenberg, A de Vos
- Legal Topics
- Road Accident Fund, Prescription of Claims, Third Party Liability, Medical Expenses, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C J Van der Merwe
Appellant
Road Accident Fund
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Magistrate's Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 17(5) of the Road Accident Fund Act confer a separate right of action to a supplier, independent of the third party's claim?
- 2 Has the supplier's claim against the Fund prescribed under section 23(1)?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 17(5) of the Road Accident Fund Act does not create a separate right of action for suppliers that is independent of the third party's claim. The supplier's claim is statutorily ceded from the third party and is subject to all the same limitations, including prescription. The cause of action for both the third party and the supplier arises at the time of the accident, not when the service is rendered. Since neither the third party nor the supplier lodged a claim within three years from the date of the accident, both claims have prescribed. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment