Van Staden and Another v Standard Bank (NCT/70149/2016/114(1)NCA) [2017] ZANCT 9 (15 February 2017)
- Citation
- [2017] ZANCT 9
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Panel
- B Dumisa, J Simpson, H Devraj
- Case number
- NCT/70149/2016/114(1)NCA
More details
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Panel
- B Dumisa, J Simpson, H Devraj
- Case number
- NCT/70149/2016/114(1)NCA
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the Applicants had lawfully requested statements of their account from the Respondent, both directly and through their authorized agent, Accord Debt Solutions CC. The Respondent failed to comply with these requests and did not participate in the proceedings. The Tribunal was satisfied that service was effected and, in the absence of any opposition, deemed the allegations admitted. Section 110 of the National Credit Act clearly entitles consumers to request account statements, and section 114 provides the Tribunal with the power to order compliance. The Tribunal granted the application and ordered the Respondent to provide the requested statement within twenty-two business days.
Court disposition
Application granted; Respondent ordered to provide account statement within 22 business days.
Orders
- The application is granted.
- The Respondent is ordered to provide the Applicants and/or their agent, at their direction, with a statement containing the current balance, amounts credited or debited, amounts overdue and when due, and amounts currently payable and the date due, for account reference number 5221266266264596338.
- The Respondent must provide the information within 22 business days from the date of this order.
- No order as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Yolanda van Staden
Applicant Counsel: Mr AltmanHendrik van Staden
Applicant Counsel: Mr AltmanStandard Bank
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Review Application / Default Judgment; Application for Order Under Section 114 of the NCA
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Respondent is obliged to provide the Applicants with a statement of their account under section 110 of the National Credit Act.
- 02
Whether the Applicants' agent was lawfully entitled to request the statement on their behalf.
- 03
Whether the Tribunal should grant the application in default of the Respondent's participation.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Applicants, represented by Accord Debt Solutions CC and Mr Altman, argued that they had lawfully requested statements of their account from the Respondent on multiple occasions, as permitted by section 110 of the National Credit Act. They submitted that the Respondent failed to comply with these requests, necessitating the application under section 114 of the NCA. The Applicants provided evidence of service and a power of attorney authorizing their agent to act on their behalf.
- Respondent
- The Respondent did not file any answering affidavit and was not present at the hearing. No arguments were submitted.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
National Credit Act, Act 34 of 2005, section 110
Section 110 of the National Credit Act obliges a credit provider to deliver, at the consumer's request, a statement of the account including current balance, credited/debited amounts, overdue amounts, and amounts payable, within specified timeframes.
- 02
National Credit Act, Act 34 of 2005, section 114
Section 114 of the National Credit Act empowers the Tribunal to order a credit provider to provide the requested statement or determine the amounts in question if the statement is not delivered within the required time.
- 03
National Consumer Tribunal Rules, Rule 13(2)
Rule 13(2) of the Tribunal Rules provides that undisputed allegations in an application may be deemed admitted if the respondent fails to file an answering affidavit.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Applicants had lawfully requested statements of their account from the Respondent, both directly and through their authorized agent, Accord Debt Solutions CC. The Respondent failed to comply with these requests and did not participate in the proceedings. The Tribunal was satisfied that service was effected and, in the absence of any opposition, deemed the allegations admitted. Section 110 of the National Credit Act clearly entitles consumers to request account statements, and section 114 provides the Tribunal with the power to order compliance. The Tribunal granted the application and ordered the Respondent to provide the requested statement within twenty-two business days.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that Accord Debt Solutions CC was lawfully acting on behalf of the Applicants by virtue of the power of attorney.
- No order as to costs was made, reflecting the Tribunal's approach to consumer protection matters.
Court disposition
Application granted; Respondent ordered to provide account statement within 22 business days.
- The application is granted.
- The Respondent is ordered to provide the Applicants and/or their agent, at their direction, with a statement containing the current balance, amounts credited or debited, amounts overdue and when due, and amounts currently payable and the date due, for account reference number 5221266266264596338.
- The Respondent must provide the information within 22 business days from the date of this order.
- No order as to costs.
Source and reliance status
National Consumer Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
National Consumer Tribunal
Judgment
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy
IN
THE NATIONAL CONSUMER TRIBUNAL
HELD
AT CENTURION
Case number: NCT/70149/2016/114(1) NCA
In the matter between:
Yolanda van Staden
1st Applicant
ID: [8...]
and
Hendrik van Staden
2nd Applicant
ID: [7...]
STANDARD
BANK
Respondent
CORAM:
Prof. B Dumisa (Presiding member)
Adv. J Simpson (Member)
Ms. H Devraj (Member)
Date of hearing – 13 February 2017
JUDGMENT
AND REASONS
THE
PARTIES
1. The Applicants in this matter are Yolanda van Staden and Hendrik van Staden (the “Applicants”) an adult female and male
consumer represented by Accord Debt Solutions CC.
2. The Respondent is STANDARD BANK, a registered company and credit provider carrying on business from 05 Simmonds Street, Johannesburg.
THE
APPLICATION
3. The Applicants brought the application in terms of section 114 of the National Credit Act, Act 34 of 2005, as amended (the NCA).
JURISDICTION
4. This National Consumer Tribunal (the Tribunal) has jurisdiction to hear this matter in terms of section 114 of the NCA. The section provides as follows:
“114. If a statement is not offered or delivered within the time required by this Part, the Tribunal, on application by the consumer, may—
(a) order the credit provider to provide the statement; or
(b) determine the amounts in relation to which the statement was sought.”
THE
HEARING
5. The application was heard on 13 February 2017.
6. The Applicants were represented by Mr Altman of Altman Attorneys, appointed by Accord Debt Solutions CC.
BACKGROUND
7. The Applicants have a credit agreement with the Respondent under reference number 5221266266264596338.
8. The Applicants requested Accord Debt Solutions to assist with resolving their financial difficulties.
9. The Applicants signed a power of attorney allowing Accord Debt Solutions to request a statement of their account on their behalf from their credit providers.
10. Accord Debt Solutions sent written requests to the Respondent to provide statements of the Applicants’ account on at least two occasions, which had not been provided up to the date of the hearing
CONSIDERATIONS
BY THE TRIBUNAL
Default judgment
11. The Respondent did not file an answering affidavit to the application and was not present at the hearing.
12. Rule 13(2) of the Rules of the Tribunal provides that if a party does not dispute allegations made in an application those allegations may be deemed as admitted.
13. Based on the papers filed with the Tribunal the application was signed on 23 November 2016 and the Applicants’ certification of service reflects that the application was served via registered post as per the registered postage slip dated 23 November 2016.
14. The Tribunal is satisfied that the application was served on the Respondent and the matter therefore proceeds on a default basis.
Applicable law
15. Section 110 of the NCA further finds application in this matter. This section provides as follows:
“110(1) At the request of a consumer, a credit provider must deliver without charge to the consumer a statement of all or any of the following—
(a) the current balance of the consumer’ s account;
(b) any amounts credited or debited during a period specified in the request;
(c) any amounts currently overdue and when each such amount became due; and
(d) any amount currently payable and the date it became due.
(2) A statement requested in terms of subsection (1) must be delivered—
(a) within 10 business days, if all the requested information relates to a period of one year or less before the request was made; or
(b) within 20 business days, if any of the requested information relates to a period of more than one year before the request was made.
(3) A statement under this section may be delivered
(a) orally, in person or by telephone; or
(b) in writing, either to the consumer in person or by sms, mail, fax, email or other electronic form of communication, to the extent that the credit provider is equipped to offer such facilities, as directed by the consumer when making the request.
(4) A credit provider is not required to provide—
(a) a further written statement under this section if it has, within the three months before the request is given, given such a statement to the person requesting it; or
(b) information in a statement under this section more than three years after the account was closed.
(5) On application by a credit provider, the Tribunal may make an order limiting the credit provider’s obligations to a consumer in terms of this section if the Tribunal is satisfied that the consumer’s requests are frivolous or vexatious.
(Date of commencement of s. 110: 1 June, 2007.)”
16. Accord Debt Solutions submitted that they had requested a copy of the credit agreement entered into between the Applicants and the Respondent and statements from the Respondent on more than one occasion namely on 04 May 2016 and again on 17 June 2016, with no success.
17. It is clear that section 110 entitles the consumer to require statements from the Respondent (credit provider) and consequently provides a remedy in section 114 of the NCA for the consumer to use to oblige the credit provider to provide the statement. Accord Debt Solutions CC was lawfully acting on behalf of the consumer by virtue of the Power of Attorney signed by the consumer and attached to the request for the statement.
18. The Tribunal accordingly finds that the Respondent is required to provide the Applicants and / or their agent, at their direction, with the information as set out in section 110(1) of the NCA.
ORDER
19. The Tribunal accordingly makes the following order -
19.1. The application is granted;
19.2. Respondent is ordered to provide the Applicants and / or their agent, at their direction, with a statement with all or any of the following information on their account under reference number 5221266266264596338 held with Respondent —
19.2.1. the current balance of the consumer’ s account;
19.2.2. any amounts credited to or debited from the account;
19.2.3. any amounts currently overdue and when each such amount became due; and
19.2.4. any amount currently payable and the date it became due.
19.3. The Respondent is ordered to provide the information in 19.1 above to the Applicants and / or their agent at their direction, by no later 22 (twenty two) business days from the date of this order; and
19.4. There is no order for costs.
Thus done and handed down on this 15th day of February 2017.
[signed]
Adv. J Simpson
Member
CONCURRING:
Prof. B Dumisa (Presiding Member) and Ms. H Devraj (Member)
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.