Venter v Khan and Others (14185/2011) [2014] ZAKZDHC 48 (3 November 2014)
The court found that clause 7 of the extension agreement, which purported to allow the employer to reclaim the defendant's membership interest in Bubaluba Properties CC upon her resignation, was unconscionable and contrary to public policy. The clause operated as a penalty, depriving the defendant of remuneration she had earned through her performance and tenure. The evidence established that the defendant was constructively dismissed due to the plaintiff's conduct, including demotion, unfounded allegations, unreasonable demands, and breaches of remuneration agreements. The plaintiff's actions undermined the relationship of trust and confidence, rendering continued employment intolerable....
- Citation
- [2014] ZAKZDHC 48
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Andre Venter; Defendant: Ayesha Khan; Defendant: Bubaluba Properties CC; Defendant: Companies and Intellectual Properties Commission
- Court
- Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 November 2014
- Case Number
- 14185/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for transfer of membership interests dismissed; defendant's counterclaim for rectification, transfer of membership interest, and payment of remuneration and leave pay granted.
- Judges
- D Pillay
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Remuneration Dispute, Forfeiture Clause, Contra Bonos Mores, Rectification of Contract, Close Corporation Membership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andre Venter
Plaintiff
Ayesha Khan
Defendant
Bubaluba Properties CC
Defendant
Companies and Intellectual Properties Commission
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the plaintiff entitled to rectification of clause 7 of the extension agreement to substitute 'employee' for 'employer'?
- 2 Do the benefits in clause 7 relate exclusively to the extension agreement or also to the 2002 agreement?
- 3 Is the plaintiff entitled to the transfer back of the defendant's membership interest in Bubaluba, or is the defendant entitled to 55% or more of the interest?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that clause 7 of the extension agreement, which purported to allow the employer to reclaim the defendant's membership interest in Bubaluba Properties CC upon her resignation, was unconscionable and contrary to public policy. The clause operated as a penalty, depriving the defendant of remuneration she had earned through her performance and tenure. The evidence established that the defendant was constructively dismissed due to the plaintiff's conduct, including demotion, unfounded allegations, unreasonable demands, and breaches of remuneration agreements. The plaintiff's actions undermined the relationship of trust and confidence, rendering continued employment intolerable....
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for transfer of membership interests dismissed; defendant's counterclaim for rectification, transfer of membership interest, and payment of remuneration and leave pay granted.
Orders
- Clause 7 of the extension agreement is rectified to substitute 'employee' for 'employer'.
- Plaintiff's claim for transfer of membership interests from the first defendant to the second defendant is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment