YM obo LM v Member of Executive Council, Health, Gauteng Province (58672/2021) [2025] ZAGPJHC 500 (22 May 2025)

YM obo LM v Member of Executive Council, Health, Gauteng Province (58672/2021) [2025] ZAGPJHC 500 (22 May 2025)

The court found that the defendant's employees delivered sub-standard care by failing to act on clear signs of foetal distress, negligently prolonging labour, and not performing a timely emergency Caesarean section. The failure to provide intrauterine resuscitation and heed warning signs constituted deviations from accepted medical practice. Applying both the 'but for' and Lee tests for causation, the court concluded that the negligent omissions and delays directly caused LM's hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and subsequent cerebral palsy. The defendant's multifactorial causation theory was rejected as speculative and unsupported by the facts. The plaintiff discharged the onus of proof on a...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPJHC 500
Parties
Plaintiff: YM on behalf of LM; Defendant: Member of the Executive Council, Health, Gauteng Province
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 May 2025
Case Number
58672/2021
Procedural Posture
Liability Only Trial / Judgment on Liability; Quantum Postponed Sine Die
Outcome
Defendant found 100% liable for the hypoxic-ischemic brain injury sustained by LM; quantum of damages postponed sine die.
Judges
PJ Du Plessis
Legal Topics
Medical Negligence, Causation, Birth Asphyxia, Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury, Standard of Care, Cerebral Palsy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

YM on behalf of LM

Plaintiff

Member of the Executive Council, Health, Gauteng Province

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Liability Only Trial / Judgment on Liability; Quantum Postponed Sine Die

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's employees delivered sub-standard care to the plaintiff during admission and treatment.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's employees negligently prolonged the plaintiff's labour.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's employees failed to timeously recommend and perform an emergency Caesarean section.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant's employees delivered sub-standard care by failing to act on clear signs of foetal distress, negligently prolonging labour, and not performing a timely emergency Caesarean section. The failure to provide intrauterine resuscitation and heed warning signs constituted deviations from accepted medical practice. Applying both the 'but for' and Lee tests for causation, the court concluded that the negligent omissions and delays directly caused LM's hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and subsequent cerebral palsy. The defendant's multifactorial causation theory was rejected as speculative and unsupported by the facts. The plaintiff discharged the onus of proof on a...

Court Disposition

Defendant found 100% liable for the hypoxic-ischemic brain injury sustained by LM; quantum of damages postponed sine die.

Orders

  • The Defendant is found to be 100% liable for the hypoxic-ischemic brain injury sustained by the minor child LM, arising from negligent medical care provided by the Defendant's employees.
  • Determination of the quantum of damages is postponed sine die.