Zonele v Member of the Executive Council of the Department of Health of the Eastern Cape Government Bhisho (241/2012) [2014] ZAECBHC 17 (23 December 2014)
The court found, on the probabilities, that antibiotics were not administered at Grey Hospital and that the clinical records and referral notes were silent on this crucial aspect. The evidence of the medical personnel was found to be unreliable and likely fabricated to protect the defendant. At Frere Hospital, antibiotics were only administered on the morning of 19 August 2010, well outside the critical window for effective infection prevention. Furthermore, the necessary re-debridement was not performed in time, despite clear indications and consent obtained for surgery. The failure to adhere to the accepted pillars of treatment for a type 3B fracture—early antibiotics and timely...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAECBHC 17
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bongani Zonele; Defendant: Member of the Executive Council of the Department of Health of the Eastern Cape Government Bhisho
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Bhisho
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2014
- Case Number
- 241/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Delictual Claim / Liability Trial; Quantum Postponed
- Outcome
- Defendant found liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of negligent medical treatment leading to amputation.
- Judges
- M Roberson
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Hospital Liability, Standard of Care, Causation, Personal Injury, Amputation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bongani Zonele
Plaintiff
Member of the Executive Council of the Department of Health of the Eastern Cape Government Bhisho
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Delictual Claim / Liability Trial; Quantum Postponed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the medical personnel at Grey Hospital and Frere Hospital were negligent in treating the plaintiff's injury.
- 2 Whether the failure to administer antibiotics and perform re-debridement constituted a breach of the required standard of care.
- 3 Whether the defendant is liable for the plaintiff's damages resulting from the amputation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the probabilities, that antibiotics were not administered at Grey Hospital and that the clinical records and referral notes were silent on this crucial aspect. The evidence of the medical personnel was found to be unreliable and likely fabricated to protect the defendant. At Frere Hospital, antibiotics were only administered on the morning of 19 August 2010, well outside the critical window for effective infection prevention. Furthermore, the necessary re-debridement was not performed in time, despite clear indications and consent obtained for surgery. The failure to adhere to the accepted pillars of treatment for a type 3B fracture—early antibiotics and timely...
Court Disposition
Defendant found liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of negligent medical treatment leading to amputation.
Orders
- The defendant is liable for such damages as the plaintiff may prove or as may be agreed.
- The defendant is ordered to pay the costs of the action to date, as well as interest on such costs at the legal rate from a date 14 days after date of allocatur to date of payment, such costs to include the qualifying expenses of Dr. P. Olivier.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment