S v Matodzi (Sentence) (CC34/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 746 (10 July 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
CC34/2024
Judge
Mosopa
The High Court sentenced Tshifhiwa Calvin Matodzi to 15 years’ imprisonment in a VBS-related fraud matter, accepting a plea and sentence agreement and declining a firearm disqualification.
V.D.M v S (CA 39/2021) [2024] ZANWHC 77 (15 March 2024)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
CA 39/2021
Judges
J T Djaje, S Mfenyana
The High Court dismissed an appeal against life sentences for two counts of rape of minors, holding there were no substantial and compelling circumstances.
William and Another v S (A064/2019) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1346 (20 November 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A064/2019
Judges
Coertse CJ AJ, Makume J
The High Court dismissed an appeal against sentence for multiple motor vehicle thefts, confirming effective 10-year sentences and finding no misdirection.
Smith v S (A27/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1001; 2023 (2) SACR 547 (GJ) (8 September 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A27/2023
Judges
D Dosio, W Britz
The High Court found that the trial court misdirected itself by placing undue emphasis on rhino poaching and the illicit trade in rhino horns, when the appellant was charged solely with theft. The trial court's approach was impermissible, as it considered aggravating factors irrelevant to the charge. The sentence of fifteen years' imprisonment was disturbingly inappropriate, especially given the appellant's status as a first offender, his family circumstances, and the recommendations for a non-custodial sentence. Comparative case law indicated that sentences for theft involving abuse of trust…
Francis v The State (1301/2021) [2023] ZASCA 30 (28 March 2023)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
1301/2021
Judges
Van der Merwe, Mabindla-Boqwana, Meyer, Weiner, Molefe
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court did not misdirect itself in finding no substantial and compelling circumstances to justify a lesser sentence than the prescribed minimum. The appellant's personal circumstances, including being a first offender, time spent in custody, and positive community contributions, were not unusual and did not outweigh the aggravating factors. As a police officer, the appellant abused his position of trust and contributed to the drug problem he was employed to combat. The lack of remorse further indicated an absence of rehabilitation prospects. The…
The magistrate misdirected himself by imposing a sentence of 22 years imprisonment on count 2, instead of the prescribed minimum of life imprisonment, without recording substantial and compelling circumstances. The appellant's advanced age and status as a pastor do not constitute substantial and compelling circumstances justifying a lesser sentence. The abuse of trust inherent in the rape of a minor by her biological father aggravates the offence. The appeal court is empowered to set aside the incompetent sentence and substitute it with the appropriate minimum sentence prescribed by law. The…
Marais v S (A04/2019) [2019] ZAGPJHC 305 (28 June 2019)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A04/2019
Judges
P D Kekana, Twala M L
Appeal against a seven-year sentence for theft dismissed. The High Court found no misdirection in the trial court’s sentencing and held the term was not shockingly inappropriate.
S v April (CC32/2017) [2018] ZAECPEHC 10 (2 March 2018)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Case number
CC32/2017
Judge
S Sephton
The High Court sentenced Simphiwe April to five years’ imprisonment for consensual sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old child under section 15 of SORMA.