Bolo v S (CA&R352/13)
Bolo v S (CA&R352/13) [2014] ZAECGHC 99 (6 November 2014)
The court held that the magistrate erred in finding joint possession of the firearm and ammunition based solely on the accused's knowledge and common purpose in the robbery. The authorities require evidence that the group intended to possess the firearm through the actual possessor and that the possessor intended to hold it on behalf of the group. In this case, there was no evidence establishing who had physical possession or that the possessor intended to possess on behalf of the group. Mere knowledge and acquiescence are insufficient to prove joint possession under the Arms and Ammunition A…
Source excerpt
- Joint Possession
- Arms And Ammunition Act
- Common Purpose
- Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
- Kidnapping
- Acquittal On Appeal