Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2024] ZAGPPHC 1349

Jantjies v S (A299/23)

Jantjies v S (A299/23) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1349 (6 December 2024)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction for murder, holding that the appellant’s statements were admissions and that the evidence proved guilt.

  • Admissions And Confessions
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Murder
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Credibility Assessment
  • Admissions-and-confessions
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2020] ZAGPPHC 241

Morathane and Another v S (A327/2017)

Morathane and Another v S (A327/2017) [2020] ZAGPPHC 241 (14 May 2020)

High Court appeal in a robbery and firearms matter. The court upheld the 1st appellant’s convictions, partly upheld the 2nd appellant’s appeal, and confirmed adjusted sentences.

  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Firearm Possession
  • Admissions And Confessions
  • Identification Evidence
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Alibi Defence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAGPJHC 647

Mgidi v S (A65/2018)

Mgidi v S (A65/2018) [2018] ZAGPJHC 647 (6 December 2018)

Appeal against conviction and sentence for arson and attempted murder dismissed. The court upheld the admissions, circumstantial evidence, and 12-year sentence.

  • Arson
  • Attempted Murder
  • Admissions And Confessions
  • Domestic Violence
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Attempted-murder
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAWCHC 106

S v Gordon (171298)

S v Gordon (171298) [2018] ZAWCHC 106 (29 August 2018)

The High Court found that the proceedings in the Magistrates' Court were not in accordance with justice. The Magistrate failed to keep a proper record, did not provide reasons for judgment, and did not adequately explain the accused's rights, particularly regarding admissions and cross-examination. The accused, being unrepresented, was not properly assisted, and his constitutional rights were not protected. The absence of a mechanical recording and the use of Afrikaans as the language of record, contrary to judicial directives, further compromised the fairness of the trial. The cumulative eff…

  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Unrepresented Accused
  • Record Of Proceedings
  • Admissions And Confessions
  • Cross Examination
  • Language Of Record
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.