Essop v S (AR 931/2004) [2014] ZAKZPHC 30; [2014] 3 All SA 337 (KZP); 2014 (2) SACR 495 (KZP) (23 May 2014)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
AR 931/2004
Judge
Gorven
The court held that while the charge sheet did not contain an express averment of prejudice, the facts alleged therein implied prejudice with reasonable certainty. The misrepresentations made by the appellant, resulting in the payment of company funds to a non-existent entity controlled by him, necessarily prejudiced Non-Ferrous Metal Works SA (Pty) Ltd. The appellant's defence that he acted on instructions from directors was rejected, as a company cannot lawfully authorise payments without a legitimate basis, and any such instruction would be void. The appellant's evidence was found to be in…
S v Chokoe (A405/2012) [2012] ZAGPPHC 95 (7 June 2012)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A405/2012
Judges
R G Tolmay, T J Raulinga
High Court special review set aside a conviction for possession of stolen property because the charge and admissions did not properly support the verdict.
Hlatswayo v S (A657/08) [2009] ZAGPPHC 230 (27 March 2009)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A657/08
Judges
K Makhafola, AP Ledwaba
The High Court dismissed an appeal against murder and attempted murder convictions, upholding the sentence and rejecting a challenge based on assessors.