Matsinhe v S (CA 20/15)
Matsinhe v S (CA 20/15) [2020] ZANWHC 37 (3 February 2020)
The court found that the complainant was properly admonished in accordance with section 164(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, as the magistrate conducted an adequate enquiry into her understanding of the truth and the oath. The evidence was reliable and supported the conviction for rape. However, the charge sheet did not clearly stipulate whether section 51(1) or 51(2) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act applied, and the magistrate convicted the appellant under section 51(2), which only permits a maximum sentence of 15 years for a first offender. The imposition of life imprisonment was therefor…
Source excerpt
- Rape Of Minor
- Admonition Of Child Witness
- Minimum Sentencing
- Jurisdiction Of Sentencing Court