D.W.T v M.T and Another (A222/2021) [2022] ZAWCHC 203 (19 October 2022)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A222/2021
Judges
NC Erasmus, VC Saldanha
The court held that the respondent, as the person in whose favour the maintenance order was made, had locus standi to enforce the order for both minor and adult dependent children. The distinction sought by the appellant between the Divorce Act and the Maintenance Act was rejected; the constitutional principles articulated in Z v Z and Bannatyne v Bannatyne apply equally to maintenance orders under the Maintenance Act. The appellant had not obtained any reduction or suspension of the maintenance order, and the funds in his bank account represented only a partial payment of the arrears owed. T…
C.D v J.H.D (10025/21) [2022] ZAGPPHC 456 (27 June 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
10025/21
Judge
WJ Du Plessis
The court found that the applicant's dismissal from employment at the respondent's company constituted a material change in circumstances, as she was previously denied maintenance on the basis of her employment and salary. The applicant demonstrated a genuine need for maintenance, having exhausted her financial resources and being unable to secure alternative employment. The respondent's financial position, including his assets and ability to make loans, indicated that he could afford the maintenance sought. The court accepted that the applicant's maintenance claim included reasonable expense…
J.M.B v D.C.J.B (98328/2015) [2018] ZAGPPHC 350 (23 March 2018)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
98328/2015
Judge
Strijdom
Rule 43 pendente lite maintenance was granted for a wife and two major dependent daughters, together with a contribution to legal costs and household expenses.