Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 82

Competition Commission of South Africa v RSC Ekusasa Mining (Pty) ltd and Others (65/CR/Sep09)

Competition Commission of South Africa v RSC Ekusasa Mining (Pty) ltd and Others (65/CR/Sep09) [2012] ZACT 82; [2012] 2 CPLR 296 (CT) (19 September 2012)

The Tribunal found that DSI and Videx contravened section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Competition Act by engaging in collusive tendering in respect of Anglo Platinum reverse auctions in 2005. Although the collusive agreements were entered into before the cut-off date for prescription, the effects of the collusion—namely, the maintenance of prices and supply arrangements—persisted beyond the cut-off date, as evidenced by ongoing sales and contracts with Anglo Platinum. The Tribunal rejected the respondents' argument that collusive tendering is a once-off event, holding that the practice continues as l…

  • Collusive Tendering
  • Bid Rigging
  • Prescription Of Prohibited Practices
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Affected Turnover
  • Section 4 Competition Act
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2011] ZACAC 6

Southern Pipeline Contractors and Another v Competition Commission (105/CAC/Dec10, 106/CAC/Dec10)

Southern Pipeline Contractors and Another v Competition Commission (105/CAC/Dec10, 106/CAC/Dec10) [2011] ZACAC 6; [2011] 2 CPLR 239 (CAC) (1 August 2011)

The Competition Appeal Court held that penalties under section 59 of the Competition Act require a structured inquiry into affected turnover and proportionality before applying the statutory cap.

  • Administrative Penalty
  • Cartel Conduct
  • Affected Turnover
  • Proportionality
  • Section 59 Competition Act
  • Mitigating Factors
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2008] ZACT 19

Competition Commission v Netcare Hospital Group (Pty) Ltd and Another (27/CR/Mar07)

Competition Commission v Netcare Hospital Group (Pty) Ltd and Another (27/CR/Mar07) [2008] ZACT 19; [2008] 1 CPLR 60 (CT) (10 March 2008)

The Tribunal refused to confirm a R6 million settlement over an unnotified merger and alleged collusive pricing, finding the agreed penalty too low.

  • Failure To Notify Merger
  • Collusive Pricing
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Affected Turnover
  • Consent Order Procedure
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.