Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPJHC 115

Epiphanyi IT Training and Advisory (Pty) Ltd v Moben South Africa (6806/2018)

Epiphanyi IT Training and Advisory (Pty) Ltd v Moben South Africa (6806/2018) [2019] ZAGPJHC 115 (27 March 2019)

The High Court dismissed an application to rescind a default judgment, finding Rule 31(5)(d) inapplicable, service proper, and new grounds in reply impermissible.

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Default Judgment
  • Service Of Process
  • Jurisdiction
  • Amendment Of Affidavit
  • Rescission-of-judgment
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2013] ZAGPJHC 143

Mostert NO v Sable Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd In re: Mostert NO v Sable Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (2011/43945)

Mostert NO v Sable Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd In re: Mostert NO v Sable Group Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (2011/43945) [2013] ZAGPJHC 143 (13 June 2013)

The court found that the alleged irregularities raised by the Applicants did not amount to procedural defects warranting the setting aside of the joinder application under Rule 30(1). The cause of action remained unchanged, and the joinder was necessitated by facts disclosed in affidavits. Amendments and supplementation of affidavits are permissible at the court's discretion, and procedural rules should not be applied so strictly as to cause injustice. The Applicants failed to provide affidavits demonstrating prejudice, which is a prerequisite for success under Rule 30. Minor drafting errors…

  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Irregular Proceedings
  • Amendment Of Affidavit
  • Court Discretion
  • Prejudice Requirement
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2011] ZACAC 4

Loungefoam (Pty) Ltd and Others v Competition Commission South Africa and Others, Feltex Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission South Africa and Others (102/CAC/Jun10)

Loungefoam (Pty) Ltd and Others v Competition Commission South Africa and Others, Feltex Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Competition Commission South Africa and Others (102/CAC/Jun10) [2011] ZACAC 4; [2011] 1 CPLR 19 (CAC) (6 May 2011)

The Tribunal's decision to allow amendments to the complaint referral was final and appealable as it disposed of jurisdictional issues. The Commission failed to properly initiate a complaint against Feltex regarding the chemical cartel, and the statutory scheme requires strict compliance with initiation, investigation, and referral procedures. The attempt to introduce new parties and causes of action by amendment was impermissible. Section 4(5)(b) of the Competition Act is exclusionary and cannot be used to attach liability to Steinhoff International and Steinhoff Africa for conduct involving…

  • Complaint Initiation
  • Jurisdiction Of Tribunal
  • Amendment Of Affidavit
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Restrictive Horizontal Practices
  • Administrative Penalty Liability
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.