Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAWCHC 389

Umegbolu and Another v Dunno Proprietary Limited and Others (17555/2024)

Umegbolu and Another v Dunno Proprietary Limited and Others (17555/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 389 (25 November 2024)

The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal against the refusal of urgent interdict relief, finding no reasonable prospects of success.

  • Leave To Appeal Test
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Anti Dissipatory Interdict
  • Right Of Audience
  • Judicial Reasoning
  • Balance Of Convenience
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 985

Evoke Reality (Pty) Ltd v Augustine and Others (2023/81925)

Evoke Reality (Pty) Ltd v Augustine and Others (2023/81925) [2023] ZAGPJHC 985 (4 September 2023)

Urgent application for an anti-dissipatory interdict dismissed because the applicant failed to show a prima facie right to commission or any asset-dissipation risk.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Anti Dissipatory Interdict
  • Estate Agent Commission
  • Mandate
  • Prima Facie Right
  • Interim-interdict
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2014] ZAGPPHC 906

One on Main Developments (Pty) Ltd v Investec Private Bank A Division of Investec Limited and Another (57348/13)

One on Main Developments (Pty) Ltd v Investec Private Bank A Division of Investec Limited and Another (57348/13) [2014] ZAGPPHC 906 (7 November 2014)

The court ordered payment of a R700,000 shortfall under a bank guarantee, dismissed the respondent’s counter-application, and awarded attorney-and-client costs.

  • Guarantee Enforcement
  • Contractual Obligations
  • Counter Application
  • Penal Costs
  • Anti Dissipatory Interdict
  • Guarantee-enforcement
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2010] ZAWCHC 397

Mitchell v Harte (10309)

Mitchell v Harte (10309) [2010] ZAWCHC 397 (11 May 2010)

The High Court reviewed and set aside maintenance proceedings because the magistrate failed to follow the required procedure for both a default order and an anti-dissipatory order.

  • Maintenance Orders
  • Default Judgment
  • Anti Dissipatory Interdict
  • Procedure In Maintenance Court
  • Maintenance-orders
  • Default-judgment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.