Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 1358

OHM Electrical Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd v Van Eeden and Another (121736/2023)

OHM Electrical Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd v Van Eeden and Another (121736/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1358 (27 December 2024)

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case of unlawful competition and breach of fiduciary and contractual duties by the first respondent, who used confidential information and company resources to benefit the second respondent while still employed. The affidavits from employees substantiated these claims and were largely uncontested by the respondents. The applicant complied with the procedural requirements of the Anton Piller order, including instituting legal proceedings within the prescribed period. The respondents' opposition was found to be evasive, lacking ge…

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Confidential Information
  • Breach Of Contract
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 727

Soares v Retief and Another (2023/082401)

Soares v Retief and Another (2023/082401) [2024] ZAGPJHC 727 (13 August 2024)

The High Court confirmed an Anton Piller order over estate-related documents, finding a prima facie case of unauthorized payments and a real risk of evidence loss.

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Estate Administration
  • Interim Relief
  • Unauthorised Payments
  • Fiduciary Duties
  • Anton-piller-order
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 542

Pathways Holdings (Pty) Limited and Another v Ribeiro and Another (2022/6747)

Pathways Holdings (Pty) Limited and Another v Ribeiro and Another (2022/6747) [2024] ZAGPJHC 542; 2025 (1) SA 298 (GJ) (5 June 2024)

The court held that the damages undertaking given in the course of obtaining an Anton Piller Order is a condition imposed by the court in the exercise of its discretion and does not create an independent substantive right of action. The enforcement of the undertaking is subject to the court's discretion, which may be exercised in subsequent proceedings, and is not limited to the court that set aside the Anton Piller Order. The court found that the exceptions raised by the defendants were unsustainable: the first exception failed because the question of enforcement of the undertaking is distin…

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Damages Undertaking
  • Exception Procedure
  • Piercing Corporate Veil
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 165

Lasercraft Mergence (Pty) Ltd v Dreyer and Others (2023-044109)

Lasercraft Mergence (Pty) Ltd v Dreyer and Others (2023-044109) [2024] ZAGPJHC 165; 2024 (6) SA 539 (GJ) (26 February 2024)

The court held that Anton Piller relief is intended to preserve evidence relevant to an existing cause of action, not to enable an applicant to formulate a cause of action. Lasercraft failed to institute proceedings within the 60-day period specified in the original order and conceded that it needed to inspect the preserved documents before pleading its case. This concession demonstrated that Lasercraft did not have a cause of action at the time it sought Anton Piller relief, and thus was never entitled to the order. The court found that there was no basis to extend the period for instituting…

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Preservation Of Evidence
  • Interim Interdict
  • Cause Of Action
  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 122

Trident South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another v Taylor and Others (B2149/23)

Trident South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another v Taylor and Others (B2149/23) [2024] ZAGPPHC 122 (6 February 2024)

The respondent failed to show good cause for extending the rule nisi to challenge the settlement agreement. He had already litigated the issue of duress in an urgent application, which was dismissed. The alleged duress, based on economic pressure and emotional trauma from lawful litigation and execution of a valid court order, is not recognised as duress in South African law. The respondent's conduct, including compliance with the agreement and intent to litigate in multiple forums, demonstrates a lack of bona fides and an abuse of process. The settlement agreement was entered into voluntaril…

  • Settlement Agreement
  • Rule Nisi
  • Duress
  • Search And Seizure
  • Anton Piller Order
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPPHC 1207

RKSA DC (Pty) Ltd v Unique Colours (Pty) Ltd and Others (53194/2021)

RKSA DC (Pty) Ltd v Unique Colours (Pty) Ltd and Others (53194/2021) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1207 (28 September 2023)

The applicant failed to establish, on a balance of probabilities, that Unique Colours possessed vital confidential information belonging to RKSA or that there was a real and well-founded apprehension that such information would be destroyed or hidden. The forensic reports did not reveal possession of the specified databases, client lists, or unique formulations by the respondents. Where information was discovered, the respondents provided plausible explanations, and factual disputes arose that could not be resolved on affidavit. The requirements for confirmation of the Anton Piller order were…

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Confidential Information
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Interdict
  • Prima Facie Case
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAWCHC 225

ADP Marine & Modular Proprietary Limited v Rocher and Others (5701/2022)

ADP Marine & Modular Proprietary Limited v Rocher and Others (5701/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 225 (25 July 2023)

The High Court confirmed an Anton Piller order in a copyright dispute over modular mineral processing plant designs and granted an interim interdict against Westarcor.

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Confidential Information
  • Interim Interdict
  • Discovery Procedure
  • Anton-piller-order
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAFSHC 281

Luxor Paints (Pty) Ltd v Gecko Coating SA (Pty) Ltd and Others (5809/2022)

Luxor Paints (Pty) Ltd v Gecko Coating SA (Pty) Ltd and Others (5809/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 281 (14 July 2023)

The court found that the applicant had established a valid cause of action and had already instituted proceedings against the respondents for unlawful competition and misappropriation of confidential formulae. The evidence demonstrated that the respondents possessed documents and digital data vital to the applicant's case, and there was a real and well-founded apprehension that such evidence could be destroyed or concealed. The execution of the Anton Piller order was conducted with appropriate safeguards and did not result in undue prejudice to the respondents. The applicant provided a compre…

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Confidential Information
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Trade Secrets
  • Condonation For Late Filing
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZASCA 79

Dhlamini v Schumann, Van den Heever and Slabbert Inc and Others (505/2021)

Dhlamini v Schumann, Van den Heever and Slabbert Inc and Others (505/2021) [2023] ZASCA 79 (29 May 2023)

The SCA held the appeal was moot on the merits in an Anton Piller matter, but it set aside the high court’s costs order and ordered each party to pay its own costs.

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Mootness
  • Costs Award
  • Superior Courts Act Section 16
  • Class Action Procedure
  • Anton-piller-order
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPPHC 759

Malefahlo v Mediclinic Heart Hospital and Another (028461/2022)

Malefahlo v Mediclinic Heart Hospital and Another (028461/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 759 (10 October 2022)

The High Court dismissed an urgent Anton Piller application seeking hospital-held statements for a contemplated defamation claim, finding the requirements unmet.

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Urgent Application
  • Defamation
  • Evidence Preservation
  • Anton-piller-order
  • Urgent-application
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.