Suleman v Ashoms (27341/2021)
Suleman v Ashoms (27341/2021) [2024] ZAGPJHC 696 (10 July 2024)
The court found that the defendant's social media publications were defamatory of the plaintiff and his ministry. The plaintiff's uncontested evidence established that the statements were wrongful and damaging to his reputation. The court applied established principles of South African defamation law, noting that damages in such cases are compensatory rather than punitive and must be proportionate to the harm suffered. The court considered the plaintiff's standing, the widespread circulation of the defamatory statements, and the absence of any apology from the defendant. The claim for R10 mil…
Source excerpt
- Defamation
- Social Media Publication
- Quantum Of Damages
- Apology As Remedy