Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2023] ZAFSHC 41

Radebe v S (A117/2022)

Radebe v S (A117/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 41 (16 February 2023)

The High Court dismissed a sentence appeal for rape and housebreaking, holding that no substantial and compelling circumstances justified departure from the prescribed minimum sentence.

  • Rape
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Housebreaking
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Appellate Interference
  • Sentencing Discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2020] ZAGPJHC 210

Manqele and Another v S (A492/2013)

Manqele and Another v S (A492/2013) [2020] ZAGPJHC 210 (4 June 2020)

High Court appeal against rape, kidnapping and related convictions and life sentences dismissed. The court found the complainant credible and the appellants' versions improbable.

  • Rape
  • Minimum Sentences
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Single Witness Evidence
  • Appellate Interference
  • Sentencing Guidelines
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] ZANWHC 54

Matsobane v S (CA71/2018)

Matsobane v S (CA71/2018) [2019] ZANWHC 54 (12 December 2019)

The court found that the trial court correctly concluded there were no substantial and compelling circumstances justifying deviation from the prescribed minimum sentence of life imprisonment for the appellant, who was convicted of two counts of rape. The appellant's personal circumstances, including his age, employment, dependents, and lack of recent criminal history, were considered but did not outweigh the seriousness and aggravating features of the offences. The appellant was known to the complainants, used threats, and committed repeated acts of rape, including kidnapping. The court held…

  • Rape
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Appellate Interference
  • Sentencing Discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] ZAGPPHC 328

Mosepele v S (A101//2018)

Mosepele v S (A101//2018) [2019] ZAGPPHC 328 (18 July 2019)

The High Court upheld an appeal against sentence, reducing a 12-year term to 5 years after finding the magistrate failed to properly weigh drug dependency and rehabilitation.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Drug Dependency
  • Habitual Criminal Declaration
  • Prevention And Treatment For Substance Abuse Act
  • Appellate Interference
  • Personal Circumstances In Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAKZDHC 16

Dlodlo v S (AR40/17)

Dlodlo v S (AR40/17) [2018] ZAKZDHC 16 (1 June 2018)

The High Court reduced a housebreaking-and-theft sentence from eight years to four years, finding the original term excessive and insufficiently tempered by mitigation.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Housebreaking With Intent To Steal
  • Theft
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Appellate Interference
  • Rehabilitation
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZAECGHC 34

Mcatshukelwa v S (CA&R290/2016)

Mcatshukelwa v S (CA&R290/2016) [2017] ZAECGHC 34 (16 March 2017)

Appeal against a 10-year sentence for robbery with aggravating circumstances dismissed; the court upheld the magistrate’s sentence disparity based on prior robbery conviction.

  • Sentencing Disparity
  • Aggravating Circumstances
  • Minimum Sentences
  • Robbery
  • Appellate Interference
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] ZAGPPHC 1161

Bezuidenhout en S (A532/2014)

Bezuidenhout en S (A532/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 1161 (23 November 2016)

Appeal against conviction on theft counts dismissed, but the 15-year sentence on count 2 was set aside and replaced with 5 years.

  • Theft By Employee
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Minimum Sentence Legislation
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Appellate Interference
  • Abuse Of Trust
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] ZANWHC 63

M.M v S (CAF19/15)

M.M v S (CAF19/15) [2015] ZANWHC 63 (25 September 2015)

Appeal against sentence for rape of the appellant’s daughter upheld; life imprisonment was replaced with 18 years after the court found substantial and compelling circumstances.

  • Rape Of Minor
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Appellate Interference
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Rape-of-minor
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2014] ZAFSHC 79

Dail v S (A145/2012)

Dail v S (A145/2012) [2014] ZAFSHC 79 (12 June 2014)

Appeal against sentence for murder. The High Court found the trial court overstepped the minimum sentence and reduced 20 years to 15 years.

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Murder
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Appellate Interference
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Minimum-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2013] ZANWHC 48

Motemba v S (CA 10/2013)

Motemba v S (CA 10/2013) [2013] ZANWHC 48 (30 May 2013)

The High Court upheld an appeal against sentence, finding ten years’ imprisonment for housebreaking and theft shockingly severe and substituting six years.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Mitigating Factors
  • Housebreaking And Theft
  • Appellate Interference
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • Appeal-against-sentence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.