Rode v Road Accident Fund (1856/2022)
Rode v Road Accident Fund (1856/2022) [2024] ZAECMKHC 134 (27 August 2024)
The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe injuries and disabilities, rendering him unable to enforce his rights or understand the claims process without assistance. The defendant's employees owed the plaintiff a duty of care to advise him properly and ensure he took necessary steps to pursue his claim. The defendant failed in this duty, and its conduct in making an offer and paying for the plaintiff's care constituted acquiescence to liability. The special plea of prescription was dismissed, as the plaintiff's cause of action was based on the defendant's negligence, not the underlyin…
Source excerpt
- Prescription
- Negligence
- Duty Of Care
- Road Accident Fund Act
- Appointment Of Curator