L v L (A3008/2021)
L v L (A3008/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 21 (1 February 2022)
The appeal succeeded because the court a quo misdirected itself by failing to properly apportion the maintenance obligations between the parents in light of their changed living arrangements and similar financial means. The court a quo acted beyond its powers in clarifying the September 2015 order and did not adequately consider all relevant circumstances, including the respondent's financial position and the appellant's expenses. The appellate court found that fairness required both parents to share the children's expenses equally, and that the appellant had shown good cause for substitution…
Source excerpt
- Maintenance Order Variation
- Joint Parental Obligation
- Apportionment Of Expenses
- Good Cause For Substitution
- Fairness In Maintenance
- Condonation Of Late Appeal