Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Alternative Dispute Resolution [2023] ZAGPPHC 1837

Transnet (SOC) Limited v Tenova Mining and Minerals South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (2022/006083)

Transnet (SOC) Limited v Tenova Mining and Minerals South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (2022/006083) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1837 (19 October 2023)

The court found that the arbitration was self-administered and not under the auspices of the Association of Arbitrators, so Rule 9 did not bar the court from entertaining the application. Rule 9 is permissive, not mandatory, and does not exclude the operation of section 13(2) of the Arbitration Act. The arbitrator made definitive findings that Transnet had no claim for damages or any other claim and no viable alternative to what it had pleaded, which created a reasonable apprehension of bias. The arbitrator's approach went beyond the scope of exception proceedings and amounted to a final view…

  • Arbitrator Removal
  • Perception Of Bias
  • Arbitration Act Section 13
  • Contractual Interpretation
  • Exception Procedure
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2012] ZAFSHC 225

Sutil NO v Matsepe NO and Ander (3480/2012)

Sutil NO v Matsepe NO and Ander (3480/2012) [2012] ZAFSHC 225 (6 December 2012)

The High Court dismissed an application to set aside an arbitrator’s appointment, holding that prior reading of potentially inadmissible material did not prove bias.

  • Arbitration Act Section 13
  • Impartiality Of Arbitrator
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Specific Performance
  • Arbitrator-bias
  • Arbitration-act
Read case analysis
Alternative Dispute Resolution [2012] ZAKZDHC 10

Umgeni Water v Hollis NO and Another (11876/10)

Umgeni Water v Hollis NO and Another (11876/10) [2012] ZAKZDHC 10; 2012 (3) SA 475 (KZD) (8 March 2012)

High Court refused to remove an arbitrator, finding no objectively reasonable apprehension of bias and dismissing the application with costs.

  • Arbitrator Removal
  • Perception Of Bias
  • Arbitration Act Section 13
  • Costs Order
  • Recusal Standard
  • Arbitrator-removal
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.