Taxpayer EJP v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT 76704)
Taxpayer EJP v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT 76704) [2024] ZATC 22; 87 SATC 331 (24 May 2024)
The Tax Court held that SARS’s Rule 31 statement in a GAAR dispute was an irregular step because it changed the basis of the assessment without a new notice.
- General Anti Avoidance Rule
- Tax Administration Act
- Procedural Fairness
- Rule 31 Statement
- Assessment Revision
- General-anti-avoidance-rule