Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Admiralty And Maritime [2024] ZASCA 67

MV New Endeavor and Others v Indian Oil Corporation Limited (283/2023)

MV New Endeavor and Others v Indian Oil Corporation Limited (283/2023) [2024] ZASCA 67; 2024 (6) SA 64 (SCA) (3 May 2024)

The Supreme Court of Appeal upheld the arrest of MV New Endeavor as an associated ship, finding Indian Oil proved common control on a balance of probabilities.

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Control Of Ship Owning Companies
  • Security Arrest
  • Family Control In Shipping
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2022] ZAKZDHC 24

DHL Project & Chartering Ltd v MV "Shandong Hai Chang" (A10/2020)

DHL Project & Chartering Ltd v MV "Shandong Hai Chang" (A10/2020) [2022] ZAKZDHC 24 (30 May 2022)

Admiralty action in rem over an associated-ship arrest failed after the court held that SIS, not SASAC, controlled Tonkolili when the claim arose.

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Control Of State Owned Enterprises
  • Foreign Law Evidence
  • Enforcement Of Arbitration Award
  • Associated-ship-arrest
  • Admiralty-law
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2020] ZAWCHC 26

Destinar Limited v NTS Shipping PTE Limited and Others (AC07/2020)

Destinar Limited v NTS Shipping PTE Limited and Others (AC07/2020) [2020] ZAWCHC 26 (28 April 2020)

The court held that Destinar lacked locus standi to challenge arrest of the vessel Ekarma and dismissed the application with costs.

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Locus Standi
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Bareboat Charter
  • Purchase And Sale Agreement
  • Admiralty-arrest
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2019] ZAWCHC 171

Motor Vessel 'Falcon Confidence' and Another v Nadella Corporation (AC5/19)

Motor Vessel 'Falcon Confidence' and Another v Nadella Corporation (AC5/19) [2019] ZAWCHC 171 (13 December 2019)

The court refused to set aside the arrest of mv Falcon Confidence and allowed a P&I Club letter of undertaking to replace a bank guarantee as security.

  • Security For Costs
  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Form Of Security
  • Letter Of Undertaking
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Bank Guarantee Vs P And I Club Lou
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2018] ZAKZDHC 3

Seaspan Holdco I Ltd and Others v MS Mare Tracer Schiffahrts GMBH & Co, KG and Another (A69/2016; A70/2016)

Seaspan Holdco I Ltd and Others v MS Mare Tracer Schiffahrts GMBH & Co, KG and Another (A69/2016; A70/2016) [2018] ZAKZDHC 3; [2018] 2 All SA 551 (KZD); 2018 (5) SA 284 (KZD) (26 February 2018)

The court held that the relevant time for determining ownership or control of an associated ship for arrest purposes under the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act is the time the protective writ is issued, not the time of arrest. The decision in 'Monica S' remains binding law in South Africa, as the Act and subsequent amendments did not alter this position. The arrest of a vessel after an arm's length sale to a third party is not unconstitutional or an arbitrary deprivation of property, as the practice is recognized internationally and mitigated by contractual indemnities and insurance. The…

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Change Of Ownership
  • Maritime Liens
  • Constitutional Interpretation
  • Protective Writs
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2017] ZAKZDHC 43

Saga Welco AS v MV "Guo Shun" (A79/2017)

Saga Welco AS v MV "Guo Shun" (A79/2017) [2017] ZAKZDHC 43 (16 November 2017)

Court set aside an ex parte arrest order for the MV Guo Shun, finding the applicant had not proved associated-ship control on a balance of probabilities.

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Hearsay Evidence
  • Control Of Company
  • Associated-ship-arrest
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2016] ZAKZDHC 41

Marubeni Corporation and Others v Intergis Co. Limited (A122/2015)

Marubeni Corporation and Others v Intergis Co. Limited (A122/2015) [2016] ZAKZDHC 41 (11 November 2016)

The High Court set aside the arrest of the MV IVS Crimson Creek, finding no prima facie claim and no genuine need for security.

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Prima Facie Claim
  • Genuine Need For Security
  • Dangerous Goods
  • Inherent Vice
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2016] ZASCA 89

Northern Endeavour Shipping Pte Ltd v Owners of NYK Isabel and Another (972/2015)

Northern Endeavour Shipping Pte Ltd v Owners of NYK Isabel and Another (972/2015) [2016] ZASCA 89; [2016] 3 All SA 418 (SCA); 2017(1) SA 25 (SCA) (1 June 2016)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a slot charterer qualifies as a 'charterer' under section 3(7)(c) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, thus enabling the arrest of the NYK Isabel as an associated ship. The court found that NYK became a party to the South African action by entering an appearance to defend, as provided by the Admiralty Court Rules. The court further held that NYK had a prima facie claim against NES, evidenced by the Brazilian judgment, and established a genuine and reasonable need for security, given NES's lack of assets and dormant status. The discretion to order…

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Security For Claim
  • Slot Charterer Status
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2016] ZAKZDHC 59

Nadella Corporation v MV "Falcon Traveller" and Another (A74/2015)

Nadella Corporation v MV "Falcon Traveller" and Another (A74/2015) [2016] ZAKZDHC 59 (1 April 2016)

The court found that Nadella Corporation had an enforceable maritime claim against Falcon Shipping, as evidenced by the indemnity clause and the subsequent arrest of the Falcon Carrier in Bangladesh. However, the court held that Nadella failed to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that the MV "Falcon Traveller" was an associated ship of the MV "Falcon Carrier" at the time the claim arose. Ownership and control of the vessels were distinct, with Falcon Shipping and Newbrook Shipping Corporation being separate entities, and Bekkers acting only as a management company. The cross mortgaging of…

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Security For Claim
  • Ownership And Control
  • Cross Mortgaging
  • Maritime Lien
  • Arbitration Security
Read case analysis
Admiralty And Maritime [2014] ZASCA 194

Owners of the MV Silver Star v Hilane Limited (82/2014)

Owners of the MV Silver Star v Hilane Limited (82/2014) [2014] ZASCA 194; [2015] 1 All SA 410 (SCA); 2015 (2) SA 331 (SCA) (28 November 2014)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a maritime claim reduced to arbitration remained enforceable by associated ship arrest, and dismissed the appeal.

  • Associated Ship Arrest
  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Charterparty Disputes
  • Indemnity Claims
  • Arbitration Award Enforcement
  • Proof Of Association
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.