South Africa Case Law

Masoanganye N.O v Nedbank Limited and Others (2024/089403)

Masoanganye N.O v Nedbank Limited and Others (2024/089403) [2025] ZAGPPHC 47 (27 January 2025)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

2024/089403

Judge

Dippenaar

The court found that, following the variation of the forfeiture order, both the capital amount and the accrued interest on the R35 million vested in the State. The forfeiture order did not create a debtor-creditor relationship between the curator (representing the State) and the DRC, and thus no debt existed that could be attached under rule 45(12). The DRC had no claim against the curator, and the assets were not subject to execution by the tenth respondent. The provisions of POCA make clear that forfeiture is to the State, not to any other party, and any rights not exercisable by the State…

Source excerpt

• Interim Interdict
• Writ Of Execution
• Forfeiture Order
• Prevention Of Organised Crime Act
• Curatorship
• Attachment Of Debt

South Africa Congo Oil Company (Pty) Ltd v Identiguard International (Pty) Ltd (710/11)

South Africa Congo Oil Company (Pty) Ltd v Identiguard International (Pty) Ltd (710/11) [2012] ZASCA 91; 2012 (5) SA 125 (SCA) (31 May 2012)

Court

Supreme Court of Appeal

Case number

710/11

Judges

MPATI, CACHALIA, LEACH, KROON, BORUCHOWITZ

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that for garnishee proceedings under rule 45(12) to be effective, the sheriff must attach the debt in accordance with the procedure set out in rule 45(8)(c), which includes giving written notice to all interested parties. Mere service of the garnishee notice on the garnishee does not constitute attachment. The rules must be read together, and the attachment requirement is not dispensed with by rule 45(12). In the present case, no notice was given to the judgment debtor (DRC), and no attempt was made to effect attachment as required. Therefore, the garnishee pr…

Source excerpt

• Garnishee Proceedings
• Attachment Of Debt
• Uniform Rules Of Court
• Rule 45
• Execution Of Judgments

Solar Sectrum Trading 120 (Edms) Bpk h/a Cash Mania v Stamier and Another (A211/11)

Solar Sectrum Trading 120 (Edms) Bpk h/a Cash Mania v Stamier and Another (A211/11) [2012] ZAFSHC 37 (1 March 2012)

Court

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

Case number

A211/11

Judges

C.J. Musi, Rampai

High Court appeal in a garnishee matter set aside an order requiring payment of commissions allegedly paid before service of the attachment order.

• Garnishee Orders
• Magistrates Court Act
• Attachment Of Debt
• Company Representation
• Garnishee-orders
• Attachment-of-debt

Executor Estate: Sorour v Scowby (AR232/08)

Executor Estate: Sorour v Scowby (AR232/08) [2009] ZAKZPHC 58 (4 September 2009)

Court

Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg

Case number

AR232/08

Judges

Sishi, Van Zyl

The court held that the expectation of inheritance prior to the confirmation of the liquidation and distribution account does not constitute a debt accruing in the future for purposes of section 72 of the Magistrates' Court Act. The right to inherit is a mere contingent interest or spes and is not attachable under a garnishee order until the estate is distributable and the right becomes enforceable. The Magistrate erred in finding that the executor was holding funds on behalf of the heir and in ordering immediate payment. Furthermore, the Magistrate failed to properly address the alleged cess…

Source excerpt

• Garnishee Order
• Attachment Of Debt
• Inheritance Rights
• Liquidation And Distribution Account
• Cession Of Rights