X.M Petse Incorporation/ Zilwa Attorneys v Nabile (CA57/2023) [2024] ZAECMHC 42 (30 May 2024)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
CA57/2023
Judges
T.V Norman, M.N. Hinana
The court held that part-payment of an attorney's bill by the client does not amount to acquiescence or waiver of the right to dispute the bill, especially where the client has expressly demanded taxation and refused to pay the balance. The magistrate correctly found that the respondent's conduct was consistent with enforcing his right to taxation and not with an unequivocal acknowledgment of liability for the full amount. Section 80(4) of the Magistrates' Courts Act is peremptory: once taxation is demanded, the action must be stayed pending taxation. The magistrate did not misdirect himself…
Sethonga and Another v Wehmeyers Attorneys (2022-042316) [2024] ZAGPPHC 14 (12 January 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2022-042316
Judge
Van den Bogert
The court found that the written fee agreements between the applicants and the respondent did not constitute contingency fee agreements as defined by the Contingency Fees Act. The agreements lacked the formalities required by the Act, and the objective evidence, including signed documents and explanations provided to the applicants, supported the respondent's version. Declaring the agreements to be contingency fee agreements would render them void due to illegality, which was not the relief sought by the applicants. The applicants did not challenge the reasonableness of the fees, and the agre…
Diobuzz (Pty) Ltd and Others v Mvumbi NO (2021/13229) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1228 (27 October 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2021/13229
Judge
Fisher
The High Court dismissed a review of a taxing master’s rulings on several bill-of-costs items, finding no basis to interfere with the discretion exercised.
Monyepao v Ledwaba and Others (1368/18) [2020] ZASCA 71 (19 June 2020)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
1368/18
Judges
Petse, Saldulker, Plasket, Nicholls, Koen
The Supreme Court of Appeal confirmed that attorneys may not charge for perusing irrelevant parts of an appeal record and made the provisional costs order final.
Ncongwane SC and Another v Ehlers Fakude Inc (41189/2017) [2017] ZAGPPHC 680 (29 September 2017)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
41189/2017
Judge
T Brenner
The court dismissed one summary judgment application for a defective affidavit and refused the other, finding a bona fide defence that the legal fees needed taxation.