Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2015] ZAGPPHC 541

Ekman v Venter & Volschenk Attorneys and Another (44655/2013)

Ekman v Venter & Volschenk Attorneys and Another (44655/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 541 (1 July 2015)

The High Court dismissed attorneys’ special pleas of prescription, finding they wilfully withheld news of expired RAF claims and prescription ran only from disclosure.

  • Professional Negligence
  • Prescription Act
  • Road Accident Fund
  • Wilful Concealment
  • Attorney Duties
  • Professional-negligence
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2015] ZAGPPHC 369

Ekman v Venter & Volschenk Attorneys and Another (44655/2013)

Ekman v Venter & Volschenk Attorneys and Another (44655/2013) [2015] ZAGPPHC 369 (1 June 2015)

The High Court dismissed special pleas of prescription in a legal-negligence claim against attorneys who failed to institute RAF claims timeously and notify the client promptly.

  • Prescription Act Section 12
  • Professional Negligence
  • Wilful Concealment
  • Road Accident Fund Claims
  • Attorney Duties
  • Prescription-act-section-12
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.